To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Cookies may be used for personalisation of ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Posted by 
I had no idea Pakistani-brits ( british/Pakistanis or what ever you may culturally identify with) had such a sense of Pythonesque sense of humour! Or did I get the wrong joke?
We assume you got the right joke. You got our ethnicity wrong, though.
We’re not bothered though. We consider it a mark of our (rather selective) impartiality.
any hints?
Hurray for casual racism!
Well here’s a picture of us executing a textbook cover drive.
We will add that we’re a different ethnicity from the neck down (or up, depending on which way you look at it.)
A rare method of dismissal indeed, that one. Even rarer than the dreaded appeal for no testicles.
Few realise this, but one of the main reasons for ladies’ cricket taking so long to take off was actually the ‘no testicles’ dismissal.
Until 1994, ‘out no testicles’ was the cause of 86.4% of all dismissals in the ladies’ game — it would have been even higher, but the bats(wo)man, rightly, gets the benefit of the doubt in some cases.
In 1994, Lamby and Beefy successfully campaigned to remove this rule in the ladies’ game — something about wanting more women in the dressing room, apparently — and the game finally took off.
The ‘no genitals’ post, in case you’re wondering.
“later in the year after Zimbabwe hit upon the ingenious idea of actually selecting a hunchback as part of their first team”
The hunchback top-scored in Zimbabwe’s second innings.