12

Australia still struggling with their over rate

Bowled on 25th November, 2008 at 11:18 by King Cricket
Category: Australia cricket news

Spitting on your own hands does not slow time - nothing slows timeRicky Ponting’s been fined again because Australia have been dithering about not bowling their overs. Why it’s happening is such a mystery that Cricket Australia even began a study at the Gabba to monitor every minute of time lost during New Zealands’ innings.

During the match, Australia made some efforts to save time. Here is our advice regarding each time-saving measure.

Bowlers hurried back to their marks
Bowlers should not then become stationary for six minutes having attained that spot.

Left hats by the boundary
The location of headwear has no bearing on the duration of overs. The Baggy Green doesn’t increase wind resistance all that much, regardless of its poor design.

Used Michael Hussey to ferry caps to the umpires between overs
Maybe try using a fielder who isn’t patrolling the boundary. Boundary fielders have a long journey to make to the umpires and this will only elongate stoppages.

We still believe that Australia should implement our one point guide to getting through overs in a timely manner:

(1) Get a move on.

If Cricket Australia need help putting this into practice, we’d be happy to chair a committee dedicated to creating some sort of special agency that could be responsible for enforcing the main thrust of this blueprint.

"It’s not that I’m lazy - it’s that I just don’t care"

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    Ceci   //   November 25th, 2008 at 12:54

    Think the main problem is the incessant pointing and waving done by Punter after EVERY ball. Perhaps if Punter was forced to keep his hands in his pockets until actually fielding, the whole game would speed up?

  2. Reply
    D Charlton   //   November 25th, 2008 at 18:52

    You are wrong in your caption KC. Travelling at the speed of light – or close to the speed of light – slows time.

    It is all in the special theory of relativity.

  3. Reply
    Dave   //   November 25th, 2008 at 19:58

    That’s some impressive pedantry, D Charlton.

  4. Reply
    Ged Ladd   //   November 25th, 2008 at 22:38

    Does the KP dance craze speed things up or slow things down?

    We need to know.

  5. Reply
    King Cricket   //   November 25th, 2008 at 22:38

    D Charlton, only relatively speaking.

  6. Reply
    D Charlton   //   November 26th, 2008 at 08:55

    I just like the King to get these things right. First there was the typo about 15 posts ago, now this. It’s not as tight as it used to be … In the days of the blue box.

    And true about slowing time only relatively. But isn’t time relative in any case? That’s the whole point.

  7. Reply
    King Cricket   //   November 26th, 2008 at 11:16

    Yes, meaning time cannot actually be slowed, surely?

    We are both out of our depth here.

  8. Reply
    D Charlton   //   November 26th, 2008 at 11:41

    It depends on where you are looking from. If you are watching someone travel at the speed of light, then the time they are experiencing is slower than yours. So time has slowed.

    I have now drowned.

  9. Reply
    Ne   //   November 26th, 2008 at 12:20

    Beware tjose who venture in to the dark arts of Physics. It’s the domain of black hearted necromancers….

  10. Reply
    Miriam   //   November 26th, 2008 at 23:46

    I’m quite sure that it’s precisely this kind of discussion that has been taking place on the field and slowing down the play.

  11. Reply
    ddm   //   November 27th, 2008 at 20:00

    always thought they were a bit over rated.

  12. Reply
    Cricket Coach   //   December 3rd, 2008 at 11:09

    Surely if Pointing kept his hands in his pockets he’d get done for BALL TAMPERING! :+)

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg