11

Australian batsmen batting on and on

Bowled on 10th July, 2009 at 10:39 by King Cricket
Category: Ashes, Australia cricket news

We tried to count to a million once - this is what it was likeThis is the toss side of the Ashes that you forget about in the two year downtime: ball not doing a lot, Australian batsmen not doing a lot wrong.

You can enliven proceedings greatly by playing the ‘how bored can I possibly make myself’ game. Put the TV on mute and try not to take in any information whatsoever. If you find yourself pondering a minor element, fight it. Maybe try and sit in a really uncomfortable position to take your mind off things.

Don’t think you’ll do better than us though. We’re brilliant at being bored, if we do say so ourself. Last week, when our flight was cancelled and we were sitting around at the airport, we thought of two quite brilliant games. Game one was ‘what does it say on the bag of peanuts?’ which is fairly self-explanatory. Game two was ‘guess what the bottles of booze in that shop are by looking at the backs of them and then maybe an hour later go and check whether you’re right or not’.

We injected an extra level of brilliance into proceedings by pacing ourselves – ie, we just sat there and spent our time looking forward to playing these games for a good hour before we actually got cracking.

We heartily recommend WG Grace Ate My Pedalo by Alan Tyers

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    SW   //   July 10th, 2009 at 10:56

    This is clearly where the English and Australian tempraments differ.
    We entertain ourselves with games, tut quietly about the situation and contemplate the finer things in life, such as peanuts.

    Australians cause a riot.
    http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21598,25760075-5017962,00.html

    Then again, if I was stuck in Perth for longer than I had to be, I might go mad.

  2. Reply
    Bert   //   July 10th, 2009 at 11:16

    At airports, pretend you’ve got two heads but that no-one has noticed yet. Then you can amuse yourself by chuckling at the bizarre lack of reaction of everyone who walks past.

  3. Reply
    wolf   //   July 10th, 2009 at 12:29

    SW I’m sad to admit you are spot on.

    Personally I’m dissapointed with the current proceedings for 2 reasons:

    1) I will no longer be 11th on cricinfo’s fantasy team list
    2) we have to tolerate Ponting as our captain for the next 3 years (at least)

    The second causes me more pain.

  4. Reply
    Bert   //   July 10th, 2009 at 15:37

    I think it’s also worth saying “congratulations” to the management and groundstaff at The Swalec Stadium for preparing such a wonderfully flat and lifeless pitch. They’ve really understood the way that test matches should be, with billions of runs scored and hardly any excitement whatsoever. I mean, who wants to see matches like Lords ‘05, Edgbaston ‘05, Old Trafford ‘05, or Trent Bridge ‘05? That sort of thing is definitely not what the paying punter wants in these days of 20/20 excitement. No, the sight of the cream of the world’s fast bowlers bowling onto a duvet resulting in an incomprehensible draw is what will bring people into cricket.

    If I had my way, I’d have them shot.

  5. Reply
    SimonC   //   July 10th, 2009 at 16:31

    Well, it was a pretty fun first day and a third, wasn’t it? Granted, it was largely due to the heroic efforts of England batsmen in finding innovative ways of getting out, but they really wrung the excitement out of a dull pitch. That’s a talent these probotic Australians will never master (tip o’ the hat to Jrod).

  6. Reply
    Ged Ladd   //   July 10th, 2009 at 19:01

    What does it say on the back of the bag of peanuts, KC?

    Don’t keep us in suspenders, there’s probably going to be rain in Wales tomorrow.

    We need something to occupy our minds.

  7. Reply
    King Cricket   //   July 10th, 2009 at 23:47

    It was nutritional information in French.

  8. Reply
    thelibrarian   //   July 11th, 2009 at 01:21

    I bet it said “warning, may contain nuts” somewhere on it…

  9. Reply
    Dan   //   July 11th, 2009 at 13:06

    This is the literal definition of being ALL OVER an opposing team

  10. Reply
    King Cricket   //   July 11th, 2009 at 13:28

    Really? When you’re all over a side, you rarely concede 400 plus.

    Batsmen can’t be all over bowlers anyway. Batsmen are dicks who ruin the game.

  11. Reply
    SW   //   July 11th, 2009 at 15:01

    Thank god we don’t have any of them in our team then, it would be most unsportsmanly.

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg