Comments on: Harold being conspicuously indifferent to the legacy of Michael Vaughan

By: Eva

Eva — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:13:59 +0000

From the angle of the second photo, it might look as if I was sitting on him, but I wasn’t. Just to clarify.

By: miriam

miriam — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:32:49 +0000

Harold may well be engrossed in the KP article, but he has his ears back in disapproval.

By: Eva

Eva — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:48:55 +0000

Ged Ladd: Quite the detective eh? They’re not mine, I’m looking after them for a friend.. I’ve never seen them before. That isn’t even my cat.

By: D Charlton

D Charlton — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:05:48 +0000

KC, it’s all a matter of perspective. Too much f***ing perspective.

By: Ged Ladd

Ged Ladd — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:46:19 +0000

Are those tennis balls or lemons in the first photo, Eva? They look like the former to me.

Don’t tell me you are moonlighting on a tennis blog with photos of tennis equipment in unusual locations?

By: King Cricket

King Cricket — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:40:47 +0000

You have to ask yourself: how much further up can we turn it?

The answer, of course, is ‘none’.

None further up.

By: D Charlton

D Charlton — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:06:53 +0000

Turn it up to 11 KC and we’ll join in.

By: King Cricket

King Cricket — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:44:20 +0000

A Spinal Tap reference! Finally!

We slip dozens of Tap references into our ‘work’. No-one ever joins in.

By: SimonC

SimonC — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:21:18 +0000

Michael Vaughan’s “I am mildly surprised by this cat’s bottom” face is a lot like his “that apparently straight ball was in fact doing complex aerobatics” face. I wonder if there’s a connection.

By: D Charlton

D Charlton — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:09:37 +0000

Talk about mud flaps, your cat’s got ‘em.