<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICC Test rankings system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/</link>
	<description>England, county cricket, India and Australia &#124; news and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:20:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23927</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23927</guid>
		<description>i believe that england will easily beat south africa in the next upcoming test match.

but surprisingly, India played fewer test matches than england but still India is on number one in the world. 

actually, it is a huge shame that India with over one billion population has never been able to reach on number one in either test or one day except this time; and that even could be just temporary. that&#039;s really shame for India. 

i believe India does not play the same number of test matches as england, south aftrica, and australia do. and that is really astonishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i believe that england will easily beat south africa in the next upcoming test match.</p>
<p>but surprisingly, India played fewer test matches than england but still India is on number one in the world. </p>
<p>actually, it is a huge shame that India with over one billion population has never been able to reach on number one in either test or one day except this time; and that even could be just temporary. that&#8217;s really shame for India. </p>
<p>i believe India does not play the same number of test matches as england, south aftrica, and australia do. and that is really astonishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23833</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23833</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my test rankings based upon similar (but equally rational) prejudices to my good friend alex.

1. England
2. Pakistan
3. West Indies
4. New Zealand
5. Sri Lanka
6. India
7. South Africa
8. Australia

In light of King Cricket&#039;s comments, I will accept that there are only a couple of points between SA and Australia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my test rankings based upon similar (but equally rational) prejudices to my good friend alex.</p>
<p>1. England<br />
2. Pakistan<br />
3. West Indies<br />
4. New Zealand<br />
5. Sri Lanka<br />
6. India<br />
7. South Africa<br />
8. Australia</p>
<p>In light of King Cricket&#8217;s comments, I will accept that there are only a couple of points between SA and Australia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pavan</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23831</link>
		<dc:creator>pavan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23831</guid>
		<description>I just wish India played south africa and beat them, then everybody would shut the fuck up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wish India played south africa and beat them, then everybody would shut the fuck up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23828</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23828</guid>
		<description>Well put.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Charlton</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23825</link>
		<dc:creator>D Charlton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23825</guid>
		<description>Cynical bating of supporters of the No.1 Test team in the world is either to be applauded or discarded.

I discard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynical bating of supporters of the No.1 Test team in the world is either to be applauded or discarded.</p>
<p>I discard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Cower</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23823</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Cower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23823</guid>
		<description>@alex: It&#039;s both funny and sad how NZ didn&#039;t get a mention even in your inebriated state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@alex: It&#8217;s both funny and sad how NZ didn&#8217;t get a mention even in your inebriated state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23822</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23822</guid>
		<description>I used shoddy, alcohol-fuelled reasoning and lazy prejudice to compile the following World Rankings-

1. England
2. India
3. South Africa
4. Sri Lanka
5. Pakistan
6. Australia
+ some other teams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used shoddy, alcohol-fuelled reasoning and lazy prejudice to compile the following World Rankings-</p>
<p>1. England<br />
2. India<br />
3. South Africa<br />
4. Sri Lanka<br />
5. Pakistan<br />
6. Australia<br />
+ some other teams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madhusudan Rao</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23820</link>
		<dc:creator>Madhusudan Rao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23820</guid>
		<description>India justifies to be the No.1 site...their performances home and abroad justifies this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India justifies to be the No.1 site&#8230;their performances home and abroad justifies this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daneel</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23819</link>
		<dc:creator>daneel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23819</guid>
		<description>The rankings only matter when they say England (or an English player) is good. Otherwise they are irrelevant.

The last time an ODI ranking was important, for example, was when Alan Mullally reached #2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rankings only matter when they say England (or an English player) is good. Otherwise they are irrelevant.</p>
<p>The last time an ODI ranking was important, for example, was when Alan Mullally reached #2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

