<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPL teams in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/</link>
	<description>England, county cricket, India and Australia &#124; news and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:20:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: King Cricket</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/#comment-19128</link>
		<dc:creator>King Cricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=907#comment-19128</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not exactly chock full of content up top either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not exactly chock full of content up top either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A P Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/#comment-19126</link>
		<dc:creator>A P Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=907#comment-19126</guid>
		<description>Is the fact that this &#039;preview&#039; thins out considerably towards the last couple of teams a subtle comment on the way the IPL&#039;s novelty is wearing off, or is it just that there&#039;s not much interesting to say about the Mumbai Indians or Rajasthan Royals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the fact that this &#8216;preview&#8217; thins out considerably towards the last couple of teams a subtle comment on the way the IPL&#8217;s novelty is wearing off, or is it just that there&#8217;s not much interesting to say about the Mumbai Indians or Rajasthan Royals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Cricket</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/#comment-19124</link>
		<dc:creator>King Cricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=907#comment-19124</guid>
		<description>John, Sree does, but Harbhajan plays for (and for a time captained) Mumbai Indians.

What we wrote was misleading though - we meant they were India team mates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, Sree does, but Harbhajan plays for (and for a time captained) Mumbai Indians.</p>
<p>What we wrote was misleading though &#8211; we meant they were India team mates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/#comment-19123</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=907#comment-19123</guid>
		<description>Would that I were, Miriam. Would that I were...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would that I were, Miriam. Would that I were&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miriam</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/#comment-19122</link>
		<dc:creator>miriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=907#comment-19122</guid>
		<description>Sorry Bert, are you a Cockley as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Bert, are you a Cockley as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/#comment-19121</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=907#comment-19121</guid>
		<description>So &#039;super&#039; is used as a prefix, even? That&#039;s an interesting development. I think I might use it myself. Can&#039;t let the absolute monarchists have all the fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8217;super&#8217; is used as a prefix, even? That&#8217;s an interesting development. I think I might use it myself. Can&#8217;t let the absolute monarchists have all the fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/#comment-19120</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=907#comment-19120</guid>
		<description>And your point is, Miriam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And your point is, Miriam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miriam</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/#comment-19119</link>
		<dc:creator>miriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=907#comment-19119</guid>
		<description>Burt Cockley! No way is that the real name of a cricketer! Surely he is in fact one of the following: 

- an elderly uncle
- a real ale enthusiast
- a morris dancer
- a folk singer
- a fisherman
- an East End publican</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burt Cockley! No way is that the real name of a cricketer! Surely he is in fact one of the following: </p>
<p>- an elderly uncle<br />
- a real ale enthusiast<br />
- a morris dancer<br />
- a folk singer<br />
- a fisherman<br />
- an East End publican</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/#comment-19118</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=907#comment-19118</guid>
		<description>Actually both Sree and HArbhajan belong to the Kings XI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually both Sree and HArbhajan belong to the Kings XI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shakester</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ipl-teams-in-2009/2009/03/25/#comment-19116</link>
		<dc:creator>shakester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=907#comment-19116</guid>
		<description>heh.

Actually, &#039;Super&#039; in the Kings name is very apt- the word is used in all kinds of ways colloquially in Tamil Nadu state (of which Chennai is the captial)- from real to the hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh.</p>
<p>Actually, &#8216;Super&#8217; in the Kings name is very apt- the word is used in all kinds of ways colloquially in Tamil Nadu state (of which Chennai is the captial)- from real to the hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

