Kevin Pietersen as an opener in one-day cricket?

Bowled on 18th February, 2011 at 13:06 by
Category: Kevin Pietersen

Threading the ball through the gap between Jupiter and Saturn

Yeah? Maybe? Dunno really.

England have long known that one-day openers are better off being twat-it-around batsmen. They haven’t fully embraced this though. They tend to pick their second or third best twat-it-around batsman for the job. Preferably the wicketkeeper.

Why not do the job properly? If you want a twat-it-around meister opening the batting, pick your best one. Plonk Kevin Pietersen there and see what his girder arms and oddly twisty torso can do.

We once suggested that Andrew Flintoff should open the batting in one-dayers. Some of our reasons for saying that are equally applicable to the use of Pietersen.

We’re not saying they’re particularly good reasons. We’re more remarking that they were once said and could, at a push, make a case for something happening that is happening anyway no matter what our thoughts on the matter might be.

Top Trumps that you can actually play, unlike our version - current price, 1p

Make an appeal
  1. Deep Cower   //   February 18th, 2011 at 14:31

    Why not Prior? He seems to be able to score fast.

    But on to the main issue, my cable service provider demands $200 for the world cup package.

    Fucking asshole.

  2. Pavan   //   February 18th, 2011 at 16:10

    I am not saying proxies.
    I am not saying bootlegs.

  3. Ceci   //   February 18th, 2011 at 19:36

    Is that why Shane Watson is sometimes referred to as Twatto? Because he’s a twat-it-around batsman? I did wonder

  4. Dandy Dan   //   February 18th, 2011 at 22:09

    What do you mean you can’t find good pictures of Chris Read?


    We’ve got the same birthday.

  5. Bert   //   February 18th, 2011 at 22:13

    You did this, KC. Just you and your ill-conceived ideas about opening the batting in ODIs. They listen, you know. MY GOD they listen. You’d just better think more carefully next time you want to say something on the subject of cricket, because this one is all incontrovertably, utterly, demonstrably YOUR FAULT!

  6. Price   //   February 18th, 2011 at 22:17

    Since the ashes there has been a disappointing amount of posts about actual cricket stories on this website and nowhere near enough posts about Sir Robert of Key.

    With regards to the latter, I am not disappointed, I’m just angry

    • King Cricket   //   February 18th, 2011 at 23:52

      That guy who hates Rob Key always gets really angry whenever we write about Rob Key and we’re a little bit scared of him.

  7. Ceci   //   February 19th, 2011 at 00:01

    I wouldn’t fear him, O King – you saw what happened a couple of posts back when Tredwell was mildly dissed – any cheek from Mr Anti-Key and you can just set the Kent Avenger aka Sarah, Canterbury onto him – she’ll throw him a few kisses in the first line or so to lure him in and then stamp all over him with her size 3 stilettos.

  8. thesaurusrus   //   February 19th, 2011 at 00:57

    How much does it cost for a size 3 stiletto stamp? Was there a Kent bowler with a name beiginning with Z played a Test for England or was that another bad dream?

    The stiletto dreams are Good!

  9. The Dawg   //   February 19th, 2011 at 08:29

    You shouldn’t fear anyone who hates Rob Key, you should pity them. Imagine how empty ones life would be to fill it with thoughts of Key hatred.

    Thesaurusrus – I’m thinking of Amjad Khan, but that lacks a Z. Maybe a dream, have you considered the Spiderman test?

  10. thesaurusrus   //   February 19th, 2011 at 09:59

    I tried the Spiderman test but I only got images of Liz Hurley and her friend Pam Anderson in totally inapproptiate clothing at the Oscars. i was thinking of Z Khan,no relation

What we mostly seem to write about


Cricket history