<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark Ramprakash moves to 98</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/</link>
	<description>England, county cricket, India and Australia &#124; news and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:20:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mahinda</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/#comment-2683</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahinda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=371#comment-2683</guid>
		<description>Just seen the octopus dance. Oh yeah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just seen the octopus dance. Oh yeah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=371#comment-2680</guid>
		<description>Not a bad idea, Ceci. Perhaps we could also solve the wicket-keeping problem by bringing back Jack Russell. 

It&#039;s one more thing taken away from the Aussies, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a bad idea, Ceci. Perhaps we could also solve the wicket-keeping problem by bringing back Jack Russell. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s one more thing taken away from the Aussies, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceci</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/#comment-2678</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=371#comment-2678</guid>
		<description>Saw Hick walloping sixes galore in some beach cricket fest the other evening . So Hick and Ramprakash, Caddick, Gough, Ali Brown...... could we aim for the oldest Test team?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw Hick walloping sixes galore in some beach cricket fest the other evening . So Hick and Ramprakash, Caddick, Gough, Ali Brown&#8230;&#8230; could we aim for the oldest Test team?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/#comment-2677</link>
		<dc:creator>t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=371#comment-2677</guid>
		<description>graeme hick is apparently looking in good form this year......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>graeme hick is apparently looking in good form this year&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/#comment-2673</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=371#comment-2673</guid>
		<description>I do like &quot;michaelivaughian&quot;. Whoever thought of that - clever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like &#8220;michaelivaughian&#8221;. Whoever thought of that &#8211; clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahinda</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/#comment-2672</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahinda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=371#comment-2672</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any need to comment because Ramps clearly doesn&#039;t need to let anything other than his mighty bat do the talking.

To say he&#039;s been harshly treated is something of an understatement. All very Michaelivaughanian if you ask me.

Oh, and I&#039;m most looking forward to seeing the octopus dance when I get home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any need to comment because Ramps clearly doesn&#8217;t need to let anything other than his mighty bat do the talking.</p>
<p>To say he&#8217;s been harshly treated is something of an understatement. All very Michaelivaughanian if you ask me.</p>
<p>Oh, and I&#8217;m most looking forward to seeing the octopus dance when I get home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt b</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>matt b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=371#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>Just read your link - glad to see you deem the octopus dance worthy of special mention too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read your link &#8211; glad to see you deem the octopus dance worthy of special mention too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt b</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>matt b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=371#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>Ah, I guess it was the same thing, but I never saw it then as it was on BBC3 (which i didn&#039;t have) and is finally now being run on BBC2, after MOTD2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I guess it was the same thing, but I never saw it then as it was on BBC3 (which i didn&#8217;t have) and is finally now being run on BBC2, after MOTD2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Cricket</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/#comment-2669</link>
		<dc:creator>King Cricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=371#comment-2669</guid>
		<description>We didn&#039;t get to be the fourth best cricket website in the eyes of Patrick Kidd of The Times without covering Last Man Standing, you know. 

We &#039;did&#039; &lt;a href=&quot;http://kingcricket.blogspot.com/2007/08/cricket-but-not-as-we-know-it.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Last Man Standing almost a year ago&lt;/a&gt;.

Was it the same episode or is it a new series?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We didn&#8217;t get to be the fourth best cricket website in the eyes of Patrick Kidd of The Times without covering Last Man Standing, you know. </p>
<p>We &#8216;did&#8217; <a href="http://kingcricket.blogspot.com/2007/08/cricket-but-not-as-we-know-it.html" rel="nofollow">Last Man Standing almost a year ago</a>.</p>
<p>Was it the same episode or is it a new series?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt b</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mark-ramprakash-moves-to-98/2008/04/17/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>matt b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=371#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>Well done Ramps, but really I was just writing to point out that in the Times you&#039;ve been rated 4th best cricket blog (no wrong, I mean website in fact!) in the known universe. Only behind cricinfo and other behemoths. I should warn you KC though, you have been named!

Even more unrelatedly, did anyone see Last Man Standing on Sunday night where the 6 guys particpated in some Papua New Guinean version of cricket, learnt from the missionaries but distorted by 100 years of island influence, resulting in about 50-a-side tribal games that include special dances for each type of wicket celebration, including the octopus dance for catches. Really, really worth watching
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2OLeJeMzEk

if you watch it you&#039;ll see other links for other clips from the programme</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done Ramps, but really I was just writing to point out that in the Times you&#8217;ve been rated 4th best cricket blog (no wrong, I mean website in fact!) in the known universe. Only behind cricinfo and other behemoths. I should warn you KC though, you have been named!</p>
<p>Even more unrelatedly, did anyone see Last Man Standing on Sunday night where the 6 guys particpated in some Papua New Guinean version of cricket, learnt from the missionaries but distorted by 100 years of island influence, resulting in about 50-a-side tribal games that include special dances for each type of wicket celebration, including the octopus dance for catches. Really, really worth watching<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2OLeJeMzEk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2OLeJeMzEk</a></p>
<p>if you watch it you&#8217;ll see other links for other clips from the programme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

