To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Cookies may be used for personalisation of ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Posted by 
Oh, what a tough choice. Or, you know, not.
Is this a choice between god and science, between religion and machine, between orphan eating and unreliable technology?
Hawkeye must be wrong. After all, Hayden has a proven track record of speaking perfect sense.
Vic Marks’ piece in the Guardian recently was spot on.
Unreliable technology everytime for me! That’s what Dickie Dawkins would go for.
Well, why don’t you put up a poll? And have your readers choose between batty Matty and Hawkeye.
Man is mortal. Socrates is a man. Ergo, Hayden is not out.
How about the 4 or 5 other appeals before he was finally given? What did hawkeye have to say about them?
I refuse to play by these rules.
Matthew Hayden is (or at least was) a really good cricketer but he’s also a really bad mouthpiece and a really bad judge of technology.
Yes, please I’d like some cake. Yes, please, I’d also like to eat it.
It is Christmas after all.
And may I be the first to congratulate Matty Hayden on his retirement in respect of his fine career.
Remember where you read it first, folks.
Haydenisms & Pontingisms are fast approaching the entertainment value of Bushims.
Sorry should have read “Bushisms”
Here’s something that Langer said about his sightscreen. This guy is talking like an Investment Banker heavily invested in real estate instruments in 2007. 🙂
“My gut feeling at the moment – albeit he has had a couple of tough decisions, he has been run out twice in his last four innings – is that maybe he is not sure,” Langer said. “There are whispers about retirement, about how long he is going to go on for and that can become a distraction.
“If he decides he wants to go to England, brilliant, he will get on [with it] and his mind will allow him to keep scoring runs. If he doesn’t, if there is a bit of a grey area, then he is going to keep going through what is, by his standards, a rough patch. The important thing is to have good communication between the selectors and Matthew Hayden, who is a great player, and they go from there.”