Comments on: Miracle Hair restoral

By: Miriam

Miriam — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:59:34 +0000

Any further evidence I might put forward is not suitable for Wisden readers.

By: Mahinda

Mahinda — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:35:51 +0000

It’s close, but it’s not quite right. I prefer it, though — that’s why you’re featured in the hallowed pages of Wisden…and I’m not.

‘headline’ yes…’outrageously’ no. And far be it from me to call him a rabid racist Aussie w***er.

Mims, how could I possibly believe that?

By: King Cricket

King Cricket — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:05:31 +0000

‘I absolutely cannot believe they’ve let that outrageously headline-grabbing, racist excuse of a man hobble on the park again.’

Your (potential) words, not ours. We want to make that absurdly clear.

By: Miriam

Miriam — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:39:41 +0000

To save you all from saying it: I’m no lady.

By: Mahinda

Mahinda — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:30:11 +0000

The number of asterisks is quite correct, but only one of the words is an actual swear word. And even then, it’s not one of the _really_ offensive ones. I mean, there are ladies* present. It just wouldn’t be cricket.

* Until I have hard evidence to the contrary, I will regard Mims and Lemon Bella as ladies. I also have my suspicions about Suave.

Actually, it might be two offensive words…I can’t actually remember what the first word was. Eleven letters…hmmm.

The only sopranos with whom I’ve had dealings are of the (light) operatic persuasion.

By: King Cricket

King Cricket — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:28:20 +0000

Are they actually accurate those quantities of asterisks? Surely there are too many?

We thought it started “f-ing money-grabbing fat f-ck of a man”.

Then we were stuck.

If our guess is right, then have you been watching The Sopranos recently Mahinda? That style of talking is addictive isn’t it, you fat f-ck?

By: Mahinda

Mahinda — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:16:00 +0000

Actually, re-reading my last post…hangman, anybody?

By: King Cricket

King Cricket — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:31:27 +0000

Five penalty runs to the opposition.

Surely you know that evidence isn’t required for such a penalty, just a vague feeling.

By: Mahinda

Mahinda — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:33:48 +0000

Now that Wisden are looking over our collective shoulders, I’d better be careful about what I say about Hair…lest the men in white coats come to take me away. Or at least penalise me five runs for tampering with my balls.

So…

I absolutely cannot believe they’ve let that *********** ********-grabbing ****** ****** of a man ****** ** the **** *****.

Arse.

By: Dada

Dada — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:42:44 +0000

Did Warney have something to do with hair coming back??
An ad opportunity for Advanced Hair Studio perhaps.