8

Peter Siddle’s bowling speed

Bowled on 27th December, 2008 at 18:02 by King Cricket
Category: Australia cricket news, Peter Siddle

Peter Siddle's axe slipped from his graspArch woodchopper cum fourth choice Australian quick, Peter Siddle, can whang the ball at speeds up to about 150kph, which is about 93mph in old money and officially makes him a fast bowler on the King Cricket scale.

In light of this, we now want to see all young English quick bowlers spending their time chopping wood rather than playing on Xbox 360s or ‘conditioning’ themselves. If you spend all your time in the gym, that’s what you’re fit for – lifting things up and putting them down again inside a gym.

Bowl some balls and chop some wood, you fin-haired jessies.

We heartily recommend WG Grace Ate My Pedalo by Alan Tyers

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    Dada   //   December 27th, 2008 at 20:10

    But the conditioning means they all have great hair…

  2. Reply
    ceci   //   December 27th, 2008 at 20:55

    …but only chopping wood from sustainable trees of course… and what ratio of chopping to bowling? Would you have wood piles 22 yards apart and bowl at the wood to be chopped? You’re getting too concise O King. Are your keys clogged up with wood chips?

  3. Reply
    damiths   //   December 28th, 2008 at 06:36

    I think at least 10 tree’s per 10 over bowling spells.

    Siddle did this as a kid, its hard to get into wood chopping once you cross a certain age.

  4. Reply
    Ged Ladd   //   December 28th, 2008 at 09:26

    Most trees are not sustainable once you chop them down, Ceci. The forests might or might not be sustainable, but the actual, individual trees……….

    Tasmania strikes me as a better venue for a good row over sustainable forestry, btw. Victoria seems to be better set in that regard.

    Yet when did we last see a decent quick bowler from Tazzie?

    KC, your theory is starting to fall down faster than a diseased Dutch Elm being hacked at by Siddle, Lee, Johnson and that most suitably-named pace bowler for such a debate, Bracken.

  5. Reply
    e normous   //   December 28th, 2008 at 11:15

    I think coal-shoveling (or whatever) Larwood proved this first. If you want bowl fast…

    chuck.

  6. Reply
    S.L.D   //   December 28th, 2008 at 12:47

    little english lads appeared to be pampered and spoilt
    hope they change soon

  7. Reply
    e normous   //   December 29th, 2008 at 16:18

    It’s funny though how what is probably one of the quickest pace bowling lineups (Lee-Johnson-Siddle) quite a while is so ineffective. Can’t help but think that they’d be much better off forgetting about line and length and strategies and what not. Smash skulls, smash stumps. That’s what you should be thinking when you bowl at 90+.

  8. Reply
    e normous   //   December 29th, 2008 at 16:20

    *in* quite a while

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg