Australia

Phil Hughes isn’t playing

Posted by
< 1 minute read

A few weeks ago, back when you couldn’t take a crap without someone knocking on the door and telling you how great he was, we said that Phil Hughes might just be a massive disappointment. Being dropped for Shane Watson is probably classed as disappointing.

But don’t worry. The stumpy little flailer will surely return for the next Test because Watson’s a nailed-on certainty to rupture his pancreas at some point over the next few days.

DON'T BE LIKE GATT!

Mike Gatting wasn't receiving the King Cricket email when he dropped that ludicrously easy chance against India in 1993.

Coincidence?

Why risk it when it's so easy to sign up?

Similar deliveries:

Default ThumbnailPhil Hughes might just be a massive disappointment Default ThumbnailPhil Hughes needs to work on his timing Default ThumbnailPhil Hughes’ Australia debut Default ThumbnailPhil Hughes scores runs when others don’t

5 comments

  1. The stumpy little flailer scored an awful lot of runs against second division bowling earlier thi season.

    Oh, and quite a lot against the Saffers before that. But then I suppose Saffers are even more extreme forms of soft southerners, even if they are the best bowling attack in the world just now.

  3. He’ll be buggered against the Saffers if Wayne Parnell gets brought into their attack.

  4. Do hope you don’t mean that literally Sami, or if you do it’s in the Jamie Redknapp league of literally

Comments are closed.