<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ravi Bopara: England number three</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ravi-bopara-england-number-three/2009/05/01/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ravi-bopara-england-number-three/2009/05/01/</link>
	<description>England, county cricket, India and Australia &#124; news and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:20:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cricket Bats</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ravi-bopara-england-number-three/2009/05/01/#comment-20875</link>
		<dc:creator>Cricket Bats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=1480#comment-20875</guid>
		<description>Ravi Bopara has the potential to become one of England&#039;s greatest batsmen.

Ian Bell is a good player but not a potential cricket great.

Michael Vaughan is on his way down.

It&#039;s a no brainer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravi Bopara has the potential to become one of England&#8217;s greatest batsmen.</p>
<p>Ian Bell is a good player but not a potential cricket great.</p>
<p>Michael Vaughan is on his way down.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a no brainer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ged Ladd</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ravi-bopara-england-number-three/2009/05/01/#comment-19998</link>
		<dc:creator>Ged Ladd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 12:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=1480#comment-19998</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to debate the notion of Ian Bell being a bit flakey.  

Ian Bell might be a bit flakey, but then again he might not.  I wouldn&#039;t like to say either way.  Time might tell, of course.  But then again, even time might not lead us to a conclusive answer on this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to debate the notion of Ian Bell being a bit flakey.  </p>
<p>Ian Bell might be a bit flakey, but then again he might not.  I wouldn&#8217;t like to say either way.  Time might tell, of course.  But then again, even time might not lead us to a conclusive answer on this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoodCricketWicket</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ravi-bopara-england-number-three/2009/05/01/#comment-19981</link>
		<dc:creator>GoodCricketWicket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=1480#comment-19981</guid>
		<description>It was at least less of an opinion about Bell than any of the others.  GCW could write a book with his opinions on IRB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was at least less of an opinion about Bell than any of the others.  GCW could write a book with his opinions on IRB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SimonC</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ravi-bopara-england-number-three/2009/05/01/#comment-19977</link>
		<dc:creator>SimonC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=1480#comment-19977</guid>
		<description>Perhaps modify to read &quot;bit flaky, we hear&quot;? Or is such blatant revisionism out of bounds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps modify to read &#8220;bit flaky, we hear&#8221;? Or is such blatant revisionism out of bounds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Cricket</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ravi-bopara-england-number-three/2009/05/01/#comment-19976</link>
		<dc:creator>King Cricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=1480#comment-19976</guid>
		<description>Damn it. We&#039;ve taken far too strong a stance there, haven&#039;t we with &#039;bit flaky&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn it. We&#8217;ve taken far too strong a stance there, haven&#8217;t we with &#8216;bit flaky&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ravi-bopara-england-number-three/2009/05/01/#comment-19975</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=1480#comment-19975</guid>
		<description>Whhooaa there, KC!
Did you just express an opinion about Ian Bell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whhooaa there, KC!<br />
Did you just express an opinion about Ian Bell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benno</title>
		<link>http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ravi-bopara-england-number-three/2009/05/01/#comment-19974</link>
		<dc:creator>Benno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=1480#comment-19974</guid>
		<description>The only thing that concerns me about Ravi is he seems to be a compulsive hooker, but for once I think the selectors made the right decision in giving him a run at #3.

His bowling has also come on in leaps and bounds and I would definitely have him as third bowling change ahead of Collie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing that concerns me about Ravi is he seems to be a compulsive hooker, but for once I think the selectors made the right decision in giving him a run at #3.</p>
<p>His bowling has also come on in leaps and bounds and I would definitely have him as third bowling change ahead of Collie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

