8

Ross Taylor hits fastest Test hundred by a New Zealander

Bowled on 28th March, 2010 at 10:54 by King Cricket
Category: Ross Taylor

Ross Taylor plays quite a flukey contextual masterpieceAre breathtaking innings all about how many sixes are hit and how few balls are faced?

Ross Taylor’s 81-ball hundred against Australia wouldn’t even be half as good as Yusuf Pathan’s 37-ball IPL hundred if that were the case. Clearly, it’s all about context.

A DLF Maximum is commonplace. In Twenty20, batsmen are obliged to score very quickly. In Test cricket, you have a choice – which makes innings like Taylor’s more audacious and more absorbing.

It’s been a low-scoring match and Taylor wasn’t short of time. He was also up against five international bowlers, rather than the one or two you get in the IPL. What does he do? He chances his arm. There’s such a broad scope as to what a player might do in a Test match – that’s the context.

Demonstrate your ability to wear a T-shirt with a King Cricket T-shirt

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    Bobby K   //   March 28th, 2010 at 12:38

    It was on a very good test pitch as well, something in it for both the batsmen and the bowlers.

    made a pleasant change!

  2. Reply
    Miriam   //   March 28th, 2010 at 13:17

    I wish this series was on tv.

  3. Reply
    Crick3tBats   //   March 28th, 2010 at 13:50

    Ross Taylor has looked to be one of the best young(ish) batsman in Test cricket for a while now. He’s just unlucky he plays for New Zealand and therefore has so much pressure on his shoulders every time he goes out to bat. Alternatively you could argue he’s lucky since it has probably meant he has had more of an opportunity to learn at Test match level.

    http://www.crick3tbats.blogspot.com

  4. Reply
    Rishabh   //   March 28th, 2010 at 15:43

    He was dropped three times and got many boundaries via edges – Yusuf’s strikes were all clean.

    Does this make me an IPL chastity protector?

  5. Reply
    King Cricket   //   March 28th, 2010 at 16:38

    We’re talking ‘good’ in terms of entertainment value, not in terms of how well he played.

    We’re saying that despite being slower and featuring fewer sixes, we think Taylor’s innings was probably more exciting.

  6. Reply
    Bobby K   //   March 28th, 2010 at 19:43

    Miriam, its not available on TV so there is nowt wrong with streaming it. If KC doesn’t mind a link be posted I will do so.

  7. Reply
    King Cricket   //   March 28th, 2010 at 19:52

    It’s not on TV, so it’s a public service, Bobby K. Go ahead.

  8. Reply
    Vim   //   March 31st, 2010 at 16:28

    It was a 20/20 innings with as Risbah says the attendant lucky slogs and sitters being dropped. Taylor looked like he just didn’t give a toss what happened to the game or his wicket.

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg