Comments on: Everyone’s favourite type of cricket news: branding news http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/royalscricket-branding/2010/02/09/ England, county cricket, India and Australia | news and blog Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:20:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Ged Kings http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/royalscricket-branding/2010/02/09/#comment-24845 Ged Kings Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:27:26 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3827#comment-24845 Excellent point, quicksingles. Excellent point, quicksingles.

]]> By: quicksingles http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/royalscricket-branding/2010/02/09/#comment-24836 quicksingles Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:52:02 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3827#comment-24836 King Cricket will surely be getting his branding kick backs from Kings Punjab XI; next season they'll be sharing drinking tips in a festival of beer. King Cricket will surely be getting his branding kick backs from Kings Punjab XI; next season they’ll be sharing drinking tips in a festival of beer.

]]> By: Ged Royal http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/royalscricket-branding/2010/02/09/#comment-24829 Ged Royal Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:19:40 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3827#comment-24829 Don't see the problem with this branding stuff myself. Anyway. shouldn't King Cricket be siding with the Royals, or am I missing something, brand-alignment-wise? Don’t see the problem with this branding stuff myself.

Anyway. shouldn’t King Cricket be siding with the Royals, or am I missing something, brand-alignment-wise?

]]> By: Kendal King Pin http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/royalscricket-branding/2010/02/09/#comment-24827 Kendal King Pin Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:52:44 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3827#comment-24827 Good point, DC. That chant should clearly read: What do we want? An simple, sustainable and relatively diverting existence. When do we want it? For a prolonged, but not unreasonable, period of time. That'll fucking show 'em. Good point, DC. That chant should clearly read:

What do we want?
An simple, sustainable and relatively diverting existence.

When do we want it?
For a prolonged, but not unreasonable, period of time.

That’ll fucking show ‘em.

]]> By: Winsome http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/royalscricket-branding/2010/02/09/#comment-24825 Winsome Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:37:54 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3827#comment-24825 Anything Warney is plugging is automatically suspect and I ain't barracking for a team that is planning on dropping the name Bushrangers just to replace it with Royals. Gack. Bloody Victorians. Anything Warney is plugging is automatically suspect and I ain’t barracking for a team that is planning on dropping the name Bushrangers just to replace it with Royals. Gack.

Bloody Victorians.

]]> By: D Charlton http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/royalscricket-branding/2010/02/09/#comment-24824 D Charlton Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:35:28 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3827#comment-24824 If you want nothing never, doesn't that mean you want everything always? Sounds very exhausting. If you want nothing never, doesn’t that mean you want everything always?

Sounds very exhausting.

]]> By: Bert http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/royalscricket-branding/2010/02/09/#comment-24823 Bert Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:12:55 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3827#comment-24823 I like it, Alex - a campaign of militancy that requires of its soldiers that they do absolutely nothing. That's my sort of protest. What do we want? Nothing. When do we want it? Never. If you need me, I'll be manning the sofa. I like it, Alex – a campaign of militancy that requires of its soldiers that they do absolutely nothing. That’s my sort of protest.

What do we want?
Nothing.
When do we want it?
Never.

If you need me, I’ll be manning the sofa.

]]> By: alex http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/royalscricket-branding/2010/02/09/#comment-24822 alex Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:39:58 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3827#comment-24822 A good way to visit suitable retribution on Sean Morris, is to confound his market analysis by making sure the 'landscape in cricket' ceases to change in any way, and becomes utterly static. I'm not quite sure how to go about doing this, though. A good way to visit suitable retribution on Sean Morris, is to confound his market analysis by making sure the ‘landscape in cricket’ ceases to change in any way, and becomes utterly static. I’m not quite sure how to go about doing this, though.

]]> By: King Cricket http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/royalscricket-branding/2010/02/09/#comment-24821 King Cricket Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:33:46 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3827#comment-24821 Brand catastrophe! Everyone drop the Q3 financial forecasts and aspirational photographs and just GET THE HELL OUT OF THE BUILDING. To all concerned: the Royals brand is dead in the water! Brand catastrophe!

Everyone drop the Q3 financial forecasts and aspirational photographs and just GET THE HELL OUT OF THE BUILDING.

To all concerned: the Royals brand is dead in the water!

]]> By: Ceci http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/royalscricket-branding/2010/02/09/#comment-24820 Ceci Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:06:22 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3827#comment-24820 is this unsavoury enough O king? http://tinyurl.com/seans-wizard-wheeze is this unsavoury enough O king?

http://tinyurl.com/seans-wizard-wheeze

]]>