10

Shane Watson and Ian Bell and what they have in common

Bowled on 30th December, 2009 at 11:45 by King Cricket
Category: Ian Bell, Shane Watson

We wrote about Shane Watson and Ian Bell over at The Wisden Cricketer. We said that they weren’t hugely popular in their respective countries, perhaps because they were overly serious. We also said that Shane Watson couldn’t bowl.

Shortly after the post went up, both Bell and Watson scored hundreds and the commenters have laid into us, saying that these hundreds prove our article wrong somehow. You’ll love it. We get called an idiot, childish and are advised to stop working.

Also, if you want to see a spectacularly clunking repetition of the phrase ‘all manner of’ in an article about people taking guard in ludicrous and implausible ways, take a look at our latest piece for Cricinfo.

We are now reading this and it is ruddy amazing

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    Ged   //   December 30th, 2009 at 14:31

    Love the tap scratch dig piece, KC.

    I have written in defenc eof your regalness on that uncouth blog; let’s see if my kind words get through the moderator there!

  2. Reply
    King Cricket   //   December 30th, 2009 at 15:46

    Thanks. Do your kind words include crass and offensive language or something?

  3. Reply
    Ged   //   December 30th, 2009 at 17:48

    Absolutely not. The moderator there seems quite happy with crass and offensive language.

    Indeed, I thought it was the lack of such that might lead to the posting’s exclusion.

  4. Reply
    monster cable   //   December 30th, 2009 at 18:43

    You do realise that no one would ever have noticed the repetition of ‘all manner of’ except that you brought it up?

    Get a grip man! Learn to back yourself! Haydos would never have done that.

  5. Reply
    monster cable   //   December 30th, 2009 at 18:44

    BTW, I enjoyed the article quite a bit.

  6. Reply
    Ged   //   December 30th, 2009 at 19:41

    As the moderator at Wisden Cricketer seems to be asleep, I thought I should cut and paste my comment on that blog here:

    “Great article, KC. Don’t let the nasty people around here upset you.

    Ged Ladd suggests that you should continue with the regal first person plural, while Ged Ladd will persevere with the Vaughanesque third person.”

  7. Reply
    brad   //   December 31st, 2009 at 00:32

    You are an idiot. And childish. Also that ’scratch tap’ thing is implausible and ludicrious. Please stop all manner of work. Idiot.

  8. Reply
    A well-known pedant   //   January 1st, 2010 at 13:06

    Possibly not as ludicrous as “ludicrious”.

  9. Reply
    Fred Grace   //   January 2nd, 2010 at 06:29

    Don’t be ridiclous

  10. Reply
    Ged   //   January 3rd, 2010 at 13:53

    Meticlous use of language there, fellas.

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg