20

Shaun Pollock’s arms of expression

Bowled on 25th October, 2007 at 10:44 by King Cricket
Category: Shaun Pollock, South Africa

There is literally no cricketing event that Shaun Pollock can’t portray through subtle distinctions in his ‘arms aloft’ pose.

pollock1.jpg
An lbw appeal.

pollock2.jpg
Celebrating a wicket.

pollock3.jpg
Celebrating a hundred.

You’ll also notice that Shaun tends to appear as a mirror image when celebrating a wicket.

Demonstrate your ability to wear a T-shirt with a King Cricket T-shirt

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    Suave   //   October 25th, 2007 at 10:58

    So it’s like that is it….

    You tease us with a few amusing little captions, contained within the alt text or title of your pictures, and then snatch that away from us, in some sort of sick and twisted way..

    I may have to renounce the monarchy and form a republic!

    Vive La Republique!

  2. Reply
    Miriam   //   October 25th, 2007 at 11:29

    Yes, where are the little captions?? Bring them back! Even Shaun Pollock wants them back – he’s doing a Star Trek hand in the first picture to show he’s joining Suave’s republic.

  3. Reply
    King Cricket   //   October 25th, 2007 at 12:00

    We’ve been doing captions off-and-on for over a year. Suddenly you want them all time.

    We’ve gone weeks without captioning with no-one noticing before now. Now it’s one post off and you’re forming a republic.

  4. Reply
    King Cricket   //   October 25th, 2007 at 12:08

    And by that we of course mean, sorry, we’ll do them all the time from now on.

  5. Reply
    Suave   //   October 25th, 2007 at 12:15

    Well, I only noticed them for the first time a week or so ago, and they were all followed up with captions, I then went back and looked at a few weeks prior and there was nothing, so I assumed you had learnt a new trick!

    I may not have to behead you now, but we’ll see.. Shaun Pollocks onside now, and I’m sure we can get a few other ageing, boring, ginger, multidimensional cricketers to join us if needs be!!

    Now where is that scrap of paper with Glen Chapple and Paul Collingwoods’ numbers?

  6. Reply
    King Cricket   //   October 25th, 2007 at 12:26

    How do you know about our recurring nightmare where Pollock, Chapple and Collingwood manhandle us towards a guillotine chanting ‘captions, captions, captions’.

    What are the chances you’d happen across that exact scenario through chance? It must be as close to ‘no chance’ as it’s possible to get.

  7. Reply
    Suave   //   October 25th, 2007 at 12:29

    Mind rays, that’s all I’m saying for the moment!!

    You remember that vision, next time you make a post.. It’s an amusing caption, or the gingers come-a-chopping!

    Good day…

  8. Reply
    Suave   //   October 25th, 2007 at 13:00

    I like your style, sire…

    I’m sure Glen is methodically sharpening the blade as we speak.

    For the moment, long live the King!

  9. Reply
    Miriam   //   October 25th, 2007 at 13:27

    THAT’S MORE LIKE IT.

  10. Reply
    the scientician   //   October 25th, 2007 at 14:36

    I have literally no clue what you are all blathering on about.

    is it science?

  11. Reply
    Suave   //   October 25th, 2007 at 14:51

    Bloody scientists, if it’s not within the realm of their understanding, it can’t be real!!

    Next you’ll be telling me the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn’t exist, and that there is no direct correlation between the number of Pirates, and the average global temperature..

    Science, Schmience.

  12. Reply
    Miriam   //   October 25th, 2007 at 17:34

    The Scientician, when this post first appeared it didn’t have any of those captions that you get when you hover over the picture with your mouse. I got excited by the captions yesterday, to the point of commenting on their existence, so was bitterly disappointed. Luckily, this discrepancy was swiftly remedied, otherwise who knows the anarchy that would have ensued.

  13. Reply
    King Cricket   //   October 25th, 2007 at 17:58

    The anarchy of a republic, we seem to remember.

  14. Reply
    Jen   //   October 25th, 2007 at 18:20

    Actually, I’m a bit disappointed about the mouse-hovering thing.

    I only ever saw the captions before on my home computer, which is pedal powered and took so long to load the pictures that the little captions were around for ever, accompanied by a little red cross. I didn’t know I could see them at work too.

    Now I discover that they’re available to all, with what I assume to be your super-whizzy broadband fancyness, I don’t like them so much. Get rid of them again if you want.

    So there.

  15. Reply
    Miriam   //   October 25th, 2007 at 18:22

    Now that we have renewed confidence in our Kindly and Benign Ruler Who Provides His People With Captions, it’s academic, but it would probably have started off as the People’s Republic of Kingcricket and then descended into anarchy as I’m not sure that we would have coped well with the sudden freedom. I like to think we would have recrowned you, though, rather than turning to despotism as an alternative.

  16. Reply
    Uncle J rod   //   October 26th, 2007 at 02:56

    This is the most interesting article ever written on Shaun Pollock.

  17. Reply
    Mahinda   //   October 26th, 2007 at 10:45

    Captions, schmaptions.

    Pollock, schmollocks.

    I like Shaun Pollock. He’s ginger, but not your half-arsed “looks a bit blond in the right light” ginger — e.g. Collingwood, Ian “Strawberry Blond” Bell, and so on.

    No, Pollock’s violently ginger, like the ginger stepchild of yore. PROPERLY ginger. I like to think that he was teased and bullied mightily at school, only to retaliate by learning to bowl fast and knocking out the teeth of his enemies with vicious bouncers.

    He probably trained by chasing ginger chickens and eating raw ginger. At the same time.

  18. Reply
    the scientician   //   October 26th, 2007 at 13:08

    oi! who you calling a scientist? I’m a scientician. There’s a world of difference.

    hovering? never noticed that before. yet more profanity and cheap digs dressed up as witticisms.

    Will the wonders of King Cricket never cease?

    I say lets go over there and burn down the castle. King Cricket lives in a castle right? I mean, he must have some sort of fiefdom going off the back of all the wonga this website makes him.

  19. Reply
    the scientician   //   October 26th, 2007 at 13:10

    and another thing. I thought Brian Lara was King Cricket? Since when did the fool who writes this junk claim the crown?

    hmm? the peasants demand an answer!

  20. Reply
    Dave   //   October 26th, 2007 at 13:57

    I think Brian Lara’s abdicated from the Cricket Throne. Rumours that he named Rob Key as his successor have yet to be confirmed.

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg