7

As a spin bowler, Graeme Swann is England’s most important player

Bowled on 30th December, 2009 at 12:58 by King Cricket
Category: Graeme Swann

All hail the chinny tweaker

Hopefully no-one’s told him yet and hopefully he never realises, but England’s performance hinges on how well Graeme Swann plays.

Obviously, taking nine wickets for not a lot had a huge impact on how England won this Test, but nowadays Swann HAS to perform.

That’s not because England’s other bowlers are mediocre. They’re not. It’s because England are only picking four bowlers and Swann is therefore bowling far more than a quarter of his side’s overs. If he bowls badly, the seamers have to get through more work, meaning they bowl worse.

On top of that, being the sole spinner, Swann’s got to be the man taking wickets on fifth day pitches as well. His batting is merely a bonus.

We move that all words such as ‘talisman’ and ‘linchpin’ be reclaimed from Andrew Flintoff and are instead applied to the chinny tweaker.

This film features marines using the bannister when they go down some stairs. What more could you want?

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    A P Webster   //   December 30th, 2009 at 17:04

    Actually, I think Swann now has more Test five-fors than Flintoff, and maybe even a better batting average too. If I wasn’t so lazy, I’d look it up.

  2. Reply
    Vim   //   December 30th, 2009 at 17:34

    He has the same no of fivefors I think, but that will change soon if the Saffers stay so mesmerised.

  3. Reply
    Tybalt   //   December 30th, 2009 at 17:49

    Swann has more career five-fors in Tests than Flintoff now, four against three.

    In Tests, he also has a higher career batting average, higher batting strike rate, better bowling average and better bowling strike rate.

  4. Reply
    Ravi   //   December 30th, 2009 at 21:49

    Flintoff is severely overated. I will never understand how he achieved a Man of the Match during the last Ashes series when Strauss was the hero. Swan will acheive far more than alcoholic Flintoff could ever dream of. Fact.

  5. Reply
    wolf   //   December 30th, 2009 at 23:46

    He may be playing well, but…..

    you’re talking about Graeme Swann.

    It sounds so wrong. To put it another way let me run a few names past you:

    Warne, Muralitharan, Swann

    See what I mean – it does not fit. Like Shane Watson it doesnt matter how many runs he scores, or wickets he takes because at the end of the day he will still be regarded as a joke.

  6. Reply
    Pat   //   December 31st, 2009 at 00:35

    If batsmen had played Gilo like they’ve collectively decided to play Hauro, Harro and Swanno, he could have shaved 10 runs off his bowling average…

  7. Reply
    pavan   //   December 31st, 2009 at 03:55

    Have to see how he takes on a rampaging sehwag..

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg