Ishant Sharma’s hair

Posted by
< 1 minute read

Ishant Sharma goes for the Eighties woman look‘I’m gangly, awkward-looking and appear to be halfway through swallowing a Rubik’s cube – how could I make myself look worse?’

This, presumably, is the thinking behind Ishant Sharma’s strange, effeminate mane. Good bowler, great slower ball, but it’s a dire situation indeed when going back to a mullet would be a wise move.


Mike Gatting wasn't receiving the King Cricket email when he dropped that ludicrously easy chance against India in 1993.


Why risk it when it's so easy to sign up?


  1. I’ll have you know that there’s nothing wrong with men having long hair.

    That said, I’ll admit that Ishant isn’t the best advert for it.

  2. Hopefully he’s justified his place in the next Test. Because he’s worth it. He’s head and shoulders above the rest.

  3. Yes, Captain K, oh yes. That’s the humour and the reason i read KC – keep it at the level everybody. (Top spot Simon C…)

  4. Too right there is absolutely nothing wrong with men having longish hair, especially if it is in good condition [so buzz cut for Shoab] But then again I don’t have Sky so maybe I’m on shaky ground here re Sharma, his hair is a bit too long but he looks good with it.

    I mean – really – ‘strange, effenminate’ are you a coiffeur envious slap-head KC? Or are you just mulling the lack of attention to a recent trip to the hairdressers yourself?

    So yes – more and better hair in cricket please! Good bowling with good hair. Sidebottom, Malinga, fab!

    Mullets however are banned! Vaughan will never perform until he gets rid of that Mullet.

    Oh yeah – and that Stuart Broad – he needs a haircut – bloody girl!

  5. It’s not just long. Long hair’s fine. This is just really weird. All volume at the base and not like bloke’s hair at all.

  6. This guy even makes drag queens look hot, he should be bowling in high heels!! Bloody cross dresser

Comments are closed.