Neil Wagner isn’t perfect

There aren’t many media outlets where this would be headline news. It is here though. New Zealand’s fourth seamer isn’t flawless. Stop the press!

It may only have been the day before yesterday, but it already seems a long, long time since we suggested that Neil Wagner never lets you down. The ‘never’ was always an exaggeration; rhetoric, if you will. Now it’s hollow, empty rhetoric that doesn’t really seem to make much sense. The Wagnermeister, as no-one calls him, took 0-49 off seven overs on the first day of the second Test against Sri Lanka. That, ladies and gentlemen, is gash.

So not content with merely failing to back up our claims, it seems Wagner went out of his way to actively disprove them. He didn’t even manage to run in all day. Brendon McCullum didn’t let him, what with all the runs he was conceding.

Share this article...Email this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0

Tired of checking the site for updates? Sign up for our near-daily email

8 Appeals

  1. King Cricket

    December 18, 2015 at 2:36 pm

    Anagram time!

    ‘Neil Wagner’ is an anagram of ‘Neil Wanger’.

    • Also ‘Enlarge Win’, a Sri Lankan cause he’s aided generously thus far.

      After this reverse-ferret, I’m looking forward to Neil Wagner destroying Sri Lanka in the second innings with 8-37, to go with his maiden test double century tomorrow.

      • King Cricket

        December 18, 2015 at 2:46 pm

        Did we mention that Dale Steyn, Hashim Amla and AB de Villiers never let you down?

  2. Steyn’s back! He’s been through all kinds in passing a fitness test:

    He even ran sprints! Very kind of him to supervise the team athletics training.

  3. My point about Wagner that I think I failed in making is that players who are talked about as ‘reliable’ are often described as such as a euphemism.

    There seems to be a feeling that people who get 3-75 on a good day are more likely to have good days more often, as though all players just sort of even out eventually. I think it’s to do with the reasons people think batsmen are ‘due’ as well. Gambler’s fallacy or some such.

    But Wagner averages 35 because his good days are both limited and not actually very frequent. Some players are, or at least have been, a bit meh.

    • King Cricket

      December 18, 2015 at 5:47 pm

      We know what you mean. Although 35 ain’t so bad in this day and age. It’s probably slightly better than you expect from a bowler like Neil Wagner, which is perhaps the point we were trying to make.

      Quite why we felt it necessary to make that point is another matter entirely.

  4. Neil Wagner always lets you down

Comments are closed.

© 2016 King Cricket

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑