19

Shivnarine Chanderpaul hits a last ball six to win

Bowled on 11th April, 2008 at 08:13 by King Cricket
Category: Chamara Kapugedera, Shivnarine Chanderpaul, Sri Lanka, West Indies

Shivnarine Chanderpaul hits a sixThis was the perfect example of how great batsmen play the situation. Shivnarine Chanderpaul’s an obdurate Test batsman. He hangs around for hours. In one-day cricket, he’s a different beast. He’s A BEAST OF WRATH. Controlled wrath, but wrath nonetheless.

The West Indies needed ten to win off the last two balls against Sri Lanka yesterday. It didn’t matter that they were nine wickets down, both balls had to exit the field of play. Shiv hit a four and then calmly volleyed a six. Job done.

You don’t get the coveted Lord Megachief of Gold title without being half decent, but Shivnarine Chanderpaul’s continuing to justify his selection.

Chamara Kapugedera had earlier hit a rescue act 95 after Sri Lanka had been 49-5. Kapugedera’s played a few matches, but this is one of the first signs that it might be worth learning his name. Maybe one day ‘Chamara Kapugedera’ will trip off the tongue as easily as ‘Shivnarine Chanderpaul, Lord Megachief of Gold’.

"It’s not that I’m lazy - it’s that I just don’t care"

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    Mahinda   //   April 11th, 2008 at 09:23

    DAMN YOU, LORD MEGACHIEF OF GOLD!

    *shakes fist in southwesterly direction*

    *sulks*

  2. Reply
    Chris   //   April 11th, 2008 at 09:56

    Watching the last 3 overs on tv last night made me realise that Shiv appears to actually be Owais Shah just with those Fruit Corner lids stuck to his cheeks… check it out… big bulging stary eyes, both forever spitting and sticking their tongues out like some gecko “on acid” ™(r), really quite bizarre.

    Have you ever seen them in the same place at the same time? no idea? me neither, but it’d be interesting if Owais hasn’t played against the windies yet…

  3. Reply
    Dave   //   April 11th, 2008 at 09:56

    That Mendis looks like one to keep an eye on, though. None of the Windies batsmen had any sort of idea what to do against him.

  4. Reply
    Suave   //   April 11th, 2008 at 10:26

    Talking of which Dave..

    New Young Buck

  5. Reply
    Suave   //   April 11th, 2008 at 10:47

    Thanks for the tidy up, I got a bit trigger happy.

  6. Reply
    King Cricket   //   April 11th, 2008 at 10:50

    We’re always on the ball in case The Scientician comes in with an unintelligible paragraph or so.

    Yours was a mere slip.

  7. Reply
    Suave   //   April 11th, 2008 at 10:53

    Is that why he’s changed his name to ne, to try to catch you out..

    Sneaky scienticians

  8. Reply
    King Cricket   //   April 11th, 2008 at 11:03

    The spelling and crass disregard for the English language as a whole make any mere name change a pointless endeavour.

  9. Reply
    Ne   //   April 11th, 2008 at 11:12

    This makes no sense without context. And I like it that way.

  10. Reply
    Robin   //   April 11th, 2008 at 12:33

    Hi,
    ‘Shivnarine Chanderpaul, Lord Megachief of Gold’.!!!!

    Let us not forgot the fact that Chanderpaul’s 10 runs from 2 balls were largely due to the fact that Vaas bowled two bad deliveries..

    Also.. such a tight situation essentially happened because Chanderpaul was not able to accelerate when run rate was around 6/over.. which put extra pressure on other batsman who found themself, having to slog..

  11. Reply
    Robin   //   April 11th, 2008 at 12:35

    Though the word ‘appeal’ for comment looks new, it sure hurts my ego.. since why should i appeal when my comment is enhancing the discussion that is going around..

    - Robin

    P.S: Just thought of sharing it.. May be.. I will get used to it once i start visiting this blog more often..

  12. Reply
    King Cricket   //   April 11th, 2008 at 12:46

    Robin, who says an appeal is a bad thing? Your appeals are most welcome.

  13. Reply
    Suave   //   April 11th, 2008 at 12:57

    But Robin, none of that matters to the Windies, because HE DID do it.

    If he had failed, then fine, bag him, but he won them that match.
    Bad bowling or not.

  14. Reply
    Mahinda   //   April 11th, 2008 at 16:33

    Besides which, Suave’s always appealing.

    Did I say that out loud?

  15. Reply
    Robin   //   April 11th, 2008 at 17:48

    Suave,
    Yeah.. Chandrapaul should be credited for ensuring a win from an improbable situtation(10 runs from 2 deliveries).. But i just disagree that
    “This was the perfect example of how great batsmen play the situation.”

  16. Reply
    King Cricket   //   April 11th, 2008 at 17:53

    Okay, but it was quite a good example. He still did it after all.

  17. Reply
    narkins   //   April 11th, 2008 at 18:52

    Don’t waver kingcricket when has “the Facts” ever bothered you before?

  18. Reply
    ddm   //   April 12th, 2008 at 08:49

    it certainly is worthwhile learning chamara kapugedara’s name, he has testes. it’s also worthwhile learning mahela udawatte’s name, the opener who was cleaned up for a duck on debut.

    luckily mendis is the name of some popular local booze so we won’t be forgetting that soon – till the next morning of course.

  19. Reply
    Sripathi Acharya   //   April 14th, 2008 at 14:47

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAJzLJtY4sI

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg