Alex Hales doesn’t have to live in a grey pigeonhole


Photo by Sarah Ansell

One of the worst things about Twenty20 cricket is that it’s provided a label for one particular shade of grey. We don’t know which one. Battleship grey maybe. Or gunmetal. It doesn’t matter. The point is, you label something and it becomes a ‘thing’ – something distinct, something fixed.

Alex Hales is a Twenty20 batsman, you see. People say he’ll bring a Twenty20 approach to Tests and because of this he effectively becomes some sort of experiment into which format is ‘better’. If he fails, the long format remains the true test. If he succeeds, Twenty20 marches on.

But Alex Hales isn’t Twenty20’s nominated representative. He’s just a cricketer. He plays all formats. He succeeds to differing degrees in each of them. He may take a different approach to other batsmen, but that’s true of absolutely everyone. Even Chris Martin. Especially Chris Martin.

David Warner is another who remains branded a Twenty20 cricketer, despite the fact that he recently skipped a very well-viewed Australian Twenty20 tournament in a bid to ensure he was at his best for Tests. Much like Virender Sehwag – another batsman who was often jammed into the wrong pigeonhole following the rise of Twenty20 – his record is far, far better in the longest format. You could argue that Warner is a Test cricketer who bats aggressively rather than a Twenty20 cricketer who plays Tests. But that’s missing the point. He’s just a cricketer. It’s all cricket.

At lunch on the first day of his second Test, Alex Hales was on 38 off 84 balls. He was the wrong grey for his normal pigeonhole. Instead, he was a perfectly effective birdshit grey – and rumour has it he can also mix plenty of other shades.

Share this article...Email this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0

Tired of checking the site for updates? Sign up for our near-daily email

7 Appeals

  1. Damn you, Hales, you’re making me look silly.

    I’m sticking to my guns. He could beat Lara’s record, still don’t rate him.

  2. How many shades of grey are there?

    • King Cricket

      January 2, 2016 at 3:50 pm

      Infinite. It’s a continuum.

      • That’s what I thought. But my wife had been reading a book on it, and she said something about trying to find new ones for the upstairs walls. Experimenting in the bedroom, I think was her exact phrase. Frankly I found the whole idea preposterous.

  3. The human eye is capable of detecting around 10 million unique colours,
    but it is only able to detect 30 shades of grey depending on the lighting.

  4. As much of a tit as Warner is, he’s a great example that a short-format chunky biffer can be capable of considerably more. Fifteen test hundreds including a double is hardly something I’d have expected when his slogging prowess got him into the Test side.

Comments are closed.

© 2016 King Cricket

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑