Adil Rashid and the art of lofting the ball over backward point

Posted by

When we wrote about how Adil Rashid is almost as good a batsman as Stuart Broad the other day, a number of people saw this as some kind of slur. Maybe they misinterpreted our words because they for some inexplicable reason do not believe that Stuart Broad is a quite wonderful batsman. Or maybe we were wrong to use a shot that resulted in his dismissal to illustrate the perfectly joyous way in which Rashid ‘plays the percentages’.

Let’s correct the second part.

In our 2019 World Cup preview profile thing, we described Rashid the finest timer of a cricket ball in the entire England batting line-up. It is this, combined with his woeful shot selection, that makes him great.

A lot of international batsmen have great timing. That’s a big part of why they’re international batsmen. A lot of tail-enders have woeful shot selection. That’s often a major part of why they’re tail-enders. What we don’t often see is someone demonstrating just how exquisite their timing truly is through repeatedly attempting strokes so ludicrously ‘low percentage’ as to be borderline suicidal.

Few batsmen explore the margins of batting possibility as reliably as Adil Rashid.

As a counterpoint to the skyer we wrote about earlier in the week, here he is gently lofting the ball over backward point for four.

Step1

Take guard outside off stump.

Step 2

Take a big stride towards square leg.

Step 3

Open bat face so that the chances of striking an 87mph full, wide delivery with something other than the edge are practically nil.

Step 4

Middle it. (Note in particular how the bat face is now actually pointing away from where the ball came from.)

Step 5

Totally normal follow-through as ball goes for four.


Oh, hey, why don’t you sign up to get our articles by email (if you haven’t already done so)?

7 comments

  1. Great article, KC.
    I think you have made your point about ‘percentage’ shots looking at examples of when they go right like on Sunday and when they go wrong.

  2. Only way to explore the benefit-cost ratio of different, novel or absurd shots is for someone with a good eye to give them a go. He’s doing a valuable service by helping us all establish the limits of the possible and/or desirable.

  3. No trolls today and also only limited prescience on this occasion. Standards are slipping. If only you had written a piece about Root’s bowling, KC.

Comments are closed.