No points for Sai Sudharsan, but a Championship for Surrey all the same

Posted by
2 minute read

The 2023 County Championship was won in the way all great sporting competitions are won: by another team failing to secure quite enough bonus points halfway through a game taking place elsewhere. Surrey are champions again. Essex are not.

Essex had needed at least 400 in their first innings against Northamptonshire to keep the title race theoretically alive, but were bowled out for 211. They didn’t take this at all well and promptly got bowled out again in 27 overs to suffer an innings defeat.

An admirable display of sulking that we heartily endorse.

Surrey also failed to get any batting bonus points, but that was far less of an issue given they’d started their final match already 20 points ahead.

They did however find the time to throw yet another name at us during their first innings, as part of their ongoing campaign to have as many contributors each season as possible – Sai Sudharsan top-scored with 73.

“Sai has come highly recommended to me by people I hugely respect,” said Alec Stewart when the club signed the Indian middle-order batter for the last three games of the season.

This makes Sudharsan sound like some hidden gem unearthed through Stewie’s vast web of contacts, rather than the fella who top-scored in the IPL final. Presumably Kumar Sangakkara and Hashim Amla also came highly recommended by people he hugely respects.

This is Surrey’s third Championship title out of the last five and the first time since 2015 that the runners-up weren’t Lancashire or Somerset.

Over at Essex, Sir Alastair Cook may or may not have finished playing cricket – no-one seems to know yet.

P.S. What a great format where the top two teams only played each other once and almost everyone else twice.

It’s the World Cup next, we suppose. You may as well sign up for our email if you enjoy our particular brand of earnest reportage.


Mike Gatting wasn't receiving the King Cricket email when he dropped that ludicrously easy chance against India in 1993.


Why risk it when it's so easy to sign up?


  1. A classic from the “King Cricket doesn’t do requests” department.

    On the previous thread Sam wrote: ” Surrey take the title once more. Now, let us never speak of it again.”…

    …so naturally KC produced this piece.

    Had Sam instead written, “I know you don’t do requests, KC, but please write a piece about Surrey winning the title”…

    …the above piece would never have existed.

  2. Well done Surrey. In the ever changing farce of county cricket it’s a miracle that a team having to adjust for so many England call ups has won the title again. Over the years other teams affected by this too. Then the point raised here that not every team plays each other twice. Then some teams produce spinner wickets that no doubt get more results than batting wickets. I’m thankful and changes mooted all the time now. I do not like the Hundred at all. Supported my local team Surrey since 1965.

Comments are closed.