What could be better than Ian Bell’s 199?

Ian Bell has never hit a Test double hundred - we know a man who hasIan Bell’s innings of 199 against South Africa was better than waking up on a Saturday thinking it’s a Monday and then realising the truth. It was better than hearing the phone ring and picking it up only to hear a dialling tone. It was even better than being asleep.

It had skill. It had determination. It had urgency when urgency was required. It had patience when patience was required. It had single-mindedness and it had beautiful, delicious remorselessness which we hadn’t even dreamed that Bell possessed.

So what could possibly be better than that? The obvious answer as to what could be better than an innings of 199 would be to say 200, but you’d be wrong. The correct, mathematically counter-intuitive answer would be an innings of 157.

For it isn’t just about the scoring or how the scoring’s done. It’s who’s doing the scoring. Rob Key hit 157 against Yorkshire this weekend.

He did everything that Ian Bell did, only he did it in Rob Key’s body, floating inches off the floor throughout and with the effortless indifference of a man who just doesn’t care, but who also cares quite a lot.

Hey you!

Can't be bothered checking King Cricket for updates?

We can come to you...

Get our articles by email (this is the best option)

Get our fortnightly email newsletter

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on Facebook

15 Appeals

  1. And with Kent requiring just 140 to win from the final day, it’s fair to say Rob Key has single-handidly lead his team to victory.

    Good effort from Bell, but must try harder.

  2. Why is the phone going dead just as you answer it always a good thing? Have you been getting death threats?

  3. Bell’s 199 was a delight – especially as it was more than KP’s derisory 152ish.

    But on the subject of King Pink Bob, I have stolen a snap from Sarah, Canterbury which clearly demonstrates The Keyster should be England Cap’n for he will confuse the Saffers who will think he must be one of their own, for he is large and red and multichinned and has clearly been feasting at PiesRus


  4. I wouldn’t have thought you’d ever answer the phone, thought of you more as a call screener.

  5. King Cricket

    July 14, 2008 at 9:35 am

    That would be impolite. The polite thing to do is to answer the phone and hope that there’s nobody there, allowing you to neatly sidestep the landmine that is ‘a conversation with another person’.

  6. I don’t think I’ve ever made a business phone call without secretly hoping the other person won’t be there.

  7. Miriam! I’m so glad that other people do that too. I must always sound slightly disappointed when the person answers, because in my head I’m hoping it’ll go to voicemail.

  8. Euch, voicemail is surely even worse though; you’ve got to supply both sides of the conversation, meaning there’s not even half a chance it’ll be intelligible. I don’t think I’ve left a single voicemail message for someone that didn’t make me want to shoot myself.

  9. But if you leave a voicemail you can tell people to email you in reply.

  10. It seems that everyone who reads this blog is socially maladjusted/shy/hates all other people.

    It’s always nice to find others who share your interests…

  11. King Cricket

    July 14, 2008 at 8:07 pm

    That comment merits this week’s (invisible) award.

    Here you go…

  12. AP Webster: to quote Seinfeld, “people? they’re the WORST”.

  13. Sorry, we’re not all socially inept, thanks!

    Suave is the pretty prince of parties.

  14. Seinfeld? Pah. I’ve tried watching it, but I just find it a bit too self-referentially up its own behind.

  15. Sarah, Canterbury

    July 15, 2008 at 8:03 pm

    I’m with Suave here (metaphorically speaking) as I have my sociable and lively moments!

    Must say am somewhat saddened to see my photo of his Pinkness abused in such a way – it’s not that Ms Masters has used it that I object to, but rather that she has done so to illustrate her misguided notion that there has been a return to his perceived former chunkiness. Harsh. Very harsh.

Comments are closed.

© 2020 King Cricket

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑