25

The five best all-rounders over the next five years

Not sure we’ve got Imran Khan or Garry Sobers on the cards, but it’s not looking bad.

Shakib Al Hasan, Bangladesh, age 22

As a cricket-writer, we’re worried there’ll be no words left in a few years time, because they’ll all have been eaten by Bangladesh criticisers. Shakib Al Hasan will make people backtrack until they’ve returned to the womb. He is the best one-day all-rounder in the world and he is 22. He is not going to get any worse at any point in the next decade. Dwell on that.

Dwayne Bravo, West Indies, 26

Played a bit. Been solid. Time to push on, Dwayne.

Mahendra Singh Dhoni, India, 28

The most dangerous batsmen are those who can destroy an attack but don’t feel that they have to. For Dhoni it’s all about the runs. He’ll get them in singles, he’ll get them in ugly works to leg. He doesn’t care. He also doesn’t care about his average. He just wants to win matches.

Matt Prior, England, 27

No, seriously. Matt Prior has been one of the best batsmen in England for quite a while and being as everyone seems to have gone a bit quiet about his keeping, that must be acceptable as well. Despite his hairline, he’s actually 27. He could prove a very important player in the next few years.

Stuart Broad, England, 23

Don’t talk him up? Tough shit. We’re starting to believe that he can bowl, which is the main thing, while he’s got bags of time to sort out the batting, which has largely been okay anyway.

We are still a bit mental about slow cookers but think we can get the meat to come out "stickier"

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    e normous   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 10:01

    I’d say Mitchell Johnson should be a much better batsman than Broad, probaby is better right now actually.

  2. Reply
    King Cricket   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 10:47

    Maybe, but we don’t think his bowling’s going to get much better and is he a fast bowler who’ll last into his thirties? He’s 28 already.

    Fair call though. He might prove a significant omission if the bowling does stand up over the next few years.

  3. Reply
    addy   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 12:40

    wht abt shahid afridi?
    and seriously matt prior

  4. Reply
    King Cricket   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 13:07

    Shahid Afridi isn’t playing Test cricket.

    Matt Prior is averaging 44 already and may well improve.

  5. Reply
    Vim   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 13:44

    Does this mean in test cricket only?

  6. Reply
    King Cricket   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 13:51

    No, but it’s probably more about Tests than the other two formats.

  7. Reply
    Pat   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 14:02

    E nourmous,

    Mitchell Johnson is a very good slogger whereas Stuart Broad is a proper batsman. Neither can bat at 7 for their country with any justification at the moment. Broad, however, might be able to get there whereas Johnson never will be able to.

    I also agree on Matt Prior with KC. He is acquiring an Alex Stuart like anonymity behind the stumps: With Stewart, you only recognized the loss once he stopped playing.

  8. Reply
    Bill   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 15:08

    Good to see Shakib on the list. Don’t know about the other 4.

    It would have been easier to mention Shakib Al Hasan 5 times instead of wasting time on those “other” players.

  9. Reply
    Mock Wah   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 15:36

    how about Shane Watson, Mitch Johnson, Albie Morkel, Angello Mathews? and Jadeja! :)

  10. Reply
    King Cricket   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 15:48
    • Shane Watson can’t bowl
    • Mitchell Johnson, see above
    • Albie Morkel can’t bowl and is only good enough to bat as a late overs slogger in one-dayers
    • Angelo Mathews is interesting, but it’s early days
    • Jadeja has done little so far
  11. Reply
    Junior   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 15:56

    Channel 4 show some good tv shows…then they started with those ‘hundred greatest’ list shows.

  12. Reply
    Deep Cower   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 18:06

    Good call on Hasan. He really is a terrific young fellow. I haven’t really watched the progress of Bravo as a test all-rounder, but he is good in the shorter formats. Whenever people project Broad as an all-rounder, I am reminded of Irfan Pathan. Before it was decided for Pathan that he could bat, he had a lovely bowling action, could swing the ball, take wickets early, and was a bits and pieces batsman. After he started “batting”, he lost his action, couldn’t swing the ball, didn’t take wickets, and was a bits and pieces batsman. One can only hope Broad still believes bowing is his primary forte.

    As for Dhoni and Prior, I am rather old-fashioned in my definition of all-rounders :)

  13. Reply
    Bobby K   //   December 3rd, 2009 at 18:55

    Bravo’s mannerisms alone are justfication for his being on the list!

  14. Reply
    brad   //   December 4th, 2009 at 07:25

    Grant Elliot?

  15. Reply
    Karthik   //   December 4th, 2009 at 07:47

    Ajith Agarkar?

  16. Reply
    The Dawg   //   December 4th, 2009 at 08:44

    I am pleased with the omission of Shane Watson. It is a mystery how he has ever taken a wicket. Also, he pisses me off. Reason enough to overlook him.

    Angelo Matthews probably worth a look though.

  17. Reply
    Spider   //   December 4th, 2009 at 15:12

    Here my list:

  18. Reply
    Steve   //   December 4th, 2009 at 20:31

    You’ve only chosen Broad over Johnson because you prefer blondes.

    Oh, and he’s a pom.

  19. Reply
    King Cricket   //   December 5th, 2009 at 11:07

    Steve, that and the five year age difference.

  20. Reply
    e normous   //   December 6th, 2009 at 11:11

    regarding the comment on Johnson’s batting, yeah, I will agree that he doesn’t look like he’s ever going to construct an innings as such – which I can sort of see Broad doing – but I think his hitting will get him enough decent scores for him to be considered a legitimate bowling allrounder.

    haven’t seen much of Shakib… series against NZ coming up I think? should be interesting.

  21. Reply
    me   //   December 16th, 2009 at 02:41

    Shane Watson is so incredibly over-rated. And every time he opens his mouth, a puppy dies. Not really – but let’s just say that he doesn’t do modesty…

  22. Reply
    Stuart Broad   //   December 16th, 2009 at 04:31

    I am Barbie and deserve to be mollycoddled!

  23. Reply
    Total sports madness   //   December 16th, 2009 at 19:08

    well u can add umar akmal to the list…..he is fantastic too

  24. Reply
    macca   //   January 18th, 2010 at 14:15

    shane watson should definately be up there. he has mastered the bat technically and become a solid opener aswel as making countless fiftys and a hundred in his call back period. he has developed a method of reverse swinging the ball miles both ways and can swing a new ball to. if he cant bowl then neither umar akmal or yousaf can bat. should no doubt be up there.

  25. Reply
    Themadnews   //   May 5th, 2010 at 21:28

    Umar akmal and the young Aussie bats man i dont remember the naem but he is a bomb player….good News for australian cricket team…

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg