Fifth Ashes Test + 14-day quarantine requirements could have equalled one of the all-time great England team selections

Posted by
2 minute read

The fifth Ashes Test is a very important thing, even when – in fact, especially when it’s a dead rubber. We hereby retract our knee jerk suggestion that they simply abandon the match in light of the two teams’ decision not to travel to Perth because of Western Australia’s 14-day quarantine requirements.

That was our initial feeling upon learning that they were going to move the Perth Test: Why bother? Just bin it. It’s not like anything will be at stake by that point and no-one plays fifth Tests any more anyway.

But then we remembered.

The fifth Test of an Ashes series Down Under has in recent times been an extraordinary thing. All the talk, all the planning, all the build-up and then come the fifth Test, England start distributing caps almost entirely at random. It’s spectacular and hilarious and probably the most interesting thing that’ll happen all series.

2013/14 was the high water mark, as documented in the Ridiculous Ashes here. That series drew to a close with a trio of debuts.

Gary Ballance was, comparatively speaking, the ‘success story’ out of the three. He was joined by Boyd Rankin, who played both his first and last Test for England, and Scott Borthwick, who can currently make the same claim. (Borthwick could theoretically still add to his tally given he hasn’t changed nationality.)

  • Ballance made 18 and 7
  • Rankin had to leave the field twice on the first day because of cramp and took 0-34 and 1-47
  • Borthwick made 1 and 4. He took 1-49 off seven overs in the first innings and 3-33 off six in the second. Half of his wickets were from full tosses

The fifth Test of the 2017-18 series wasn’t quite in the same league, but Mason Crane is nevertheless still kicking around looking for an opportunity to bring his Test bowling average of 193 down a smidge.

Viewed in this light, the unacceptability of Perth’s 14-day quarantine requirements seems… not all that unacceptable at all actually. Why not just go the whole fifth-Ashes-Test hog and select an entirely new England squad for that match out of whoever happens to be in the vicinity with roughly the right accent?

This seems to us to be the perfect solution: less disruption, more fun and a pretty decent excuse for the tourists when they get annihilated.

Follow the full horror of the 2021/22 Ashes with us. Sign up for our email.


Mike Gatting wasn't receiving the King Cricket email when he dropped that ludicrously easy chance against India in 1993.


Why risk it when it's so easy to sign up?


    1. I’d save Jimmy for Adelaide for tactical reasons and there are reasons to believe that this is truly a tactical move. Chris Woakes could be just as effective or more effective than Jimmy with the ball at the Gabba and the stronger lower-order batting might be just the ticket.

      There’s a bit of weather around at Brisbane too.

      As for the fifth test, KC – I can hardly think beyond next Friday, let alone envisage mid-January,

      1. Jimmy’s record at Brisbane is dire. 925 deliveries, 526 runs, 7 wickets. That’s a bowling average above 75 runs per wicket, a strike rate above 132 deliveries per wicket and an economy rate of 3.41.

        Saving Jimmy for Adelaide in these back-to-back test circumstances would make sense to me, niggle or no.

        Woakes should enjoy the conditions if it is perchance a Gabba green top that swings.

    2. BBC are reporting that he is being ‘rested’, which takes the “what are you being rested for that’s more important than this?” argument to a new level. Surely he is injured

      1. When is a ‘niggle’ an injury?

        Best bowler in the world, on a green top, when it’s been raining, and Australia haven’t played a Test for almost a year.

        If he’s fit to play, play him.

Comments are closed.