10

Ball of the century and Lara’s 400

Bowled on 28th October, 2011 at 09:10 by
Category: King Cricket

How many times does something have to appear to qualify as a regular feature? If it’s twice, we have a regular feature at Cricinfo.

It is about two idiot commentators commentating like idiots. It is called Stu and Ash. The first instalment was about Shane Warne’s ball of the century. The second focuses on Lara’s 400 against England.

Why not join everyone else in assuming that being as we wrote the characters’ words, we share their opinions. If you need a recommendation, try the words of ColdMenace who felt moved to comment “yawn”.

Demonstrate your ability to wear a T-shirt with a King Cricket T-shirt

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    Dandy Dan   //   October 28th, 2011 at 10:28

    Cricinfo comments are almost as entertaining as youtube comments.

    • King Cricket   //   October 28th, 2011 at 11:37

      Someone seems to think they’re real people and has taken issue with the opinions voiced by Ash.

      This despite the fact that the statistician in the piece doesn’t know that Australia is a country, not a person.

  2. Reply
    Ged   //   October 28th, 2011 at 11:00

    Superb stuff.

    I love the reference to Proust in the context of commentary-box Battenberg cake.

    “A la recherche du stumps perdu” as we say in the Proustian-cricket-writing trade.

    • King Cricket   //   October 28th, 2011 at 11:27

      That sentence actually stands up to scrutiny. Well done. Top marks.

    • Ged   //   October 28th, 2011 at 15:26

      No need to sound *so* surprised that I am able to parse a slightly tricky quip, KC!

  3. Reply
    Deep Cower   //   October 28th, 2011 at 14:06

    To be fair to the cricinfo commenters, KC, there seems to be a good number of well-informed, balanced readers out there who also seem to think you are shit.

  4. Reply
    Dave   //   October 28th, 2011 at 17:46

    Are you still almost as funny as Andrew Hughes or have you managed to pass that milestone now?

    • King Cricket   //   October 28th, 2011 at 18:25

      Think we’ve dropped back, actually. It’s more that we aren’t fit to be mentioned in the same sentence as Andrew Hughes now.

    • Deep Cower   //   October 28th, 2011 at 19:28

      Blah! Damn your modesty. You’re way funnier than Andrew Hughes.

  5. Reply
    Matt   //   November 1st, 2011 at 11:56

    Frustrating how few people on the comments realised that the article isn’t even criticising Brian Lara and his 400no, it’s poking fun at the IPL and the commentary you get on it (with a little bit of TMS commentary thrown in). I thought it was funny. Perhaps you need to dumb down your humour (even more)? Perhaps just write an article about how Sachin Tendulkar is actually God. No humour. No no. Just the facts.

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

No related posts.

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg