An England v Pakistan Test series “precap” (with preamble)

Posted by
4 minute read

We were going to do a recap of the England v Ireland one-dayers, but they haven’t actually finished yet. So instead we thought we’d switch focus and do a ‘precap’ of the Pakistan series.

We thought we were being wilfully annoying by using a made-up word like ‘precap’ when we could of course just say ‘preview’. But it turns out ‘precap’ is a word that people genuinely use. So now we’re the one who’s annoyed because ‘precap’ is a stupid word.

The Ireland series recap/review would have been a short one anyway. The story’s really just that England’s established fringe players (David Willey and Sam Billings) have performed well while Ireland have looked a bit rusty.

So let’s move on.

Let’s precap.


‘Precap’ tends to be used in reference to those little montages that truly abominable US TV series use to show you what’s going to happen before it actually officially happens. The very worst shows of all will run a big precap at the start and another one before and after each ad break. If the precaps are sufficiently long and the ad breaks sufficiently frequent, you’ll often find that there is pretty much zero additional footage that isn’t already in the montages.

This article is nothing like that. Where 75 per cent of those shows are repeated airings of the main material, this article is 75 per cent preamble. It’s more like a programme where they’ve done a cold open and the cold open goes on and on and on and you feel like you’re never actually going to get to the main bit.

But we will get to the main bit. We promise. In fact we’re going to to get to the main bit now.

(Well, almost now. We can’t help but pause a second to highlight the fact that we have just written a whole section headed ‘Precap’ which is not in fact the precap but in fact just more words about the concept of the precap. This section could more accurately be headed ‘Preamble’. But then what would that make the section above it?)

England v Pakistan precap

Let’s start with a recap.

The England v West Indies series was to a great extent decided by England’s ability to field two seam attacks versus the tourists’ reliance on one.

Shannon Gabriel seemed to personify the challenges faced by the Windies.

There’s a scene in Mean Streets where a character played by David Carradine – listed in the credits only as “Drunk” – is repeatedly shot by someone but he just keeps coming at them despite this. Trying to work out how he managed it, other characters later theorise that Carradine’s character was so shitfaced he didn’t entirely realise he’d been shot.

We’re not saying that Shannon Gabriel was drunk for most of the Test series, but he did give the impression of being someone who wasn’t entirely aware of how damaged he was. Halfway through the first Test, he was fielding like your granny and he grew visibly more tired as the series wore on.

Gabriel seemed to be forever going off injured halfway through an over. Yet where Alzarri Joseph understandably succumbed to the back-to-back-to-back format of the series, sitting out the final Test, Gabriel played all three matches and was somehow still cranking it up to 90mph in the third.

Near-superhuman physical endurance is great and all, but the team that won the series simply swapped out tiring bowlers for different ones who performed every bit as well. The Windies attack has a lovely amorphously complementary nature to it, but it’s really just those four main guys at the minute. England could spread the workload better.

So what about Pakistan?

No, seriously, this bit’s the precap

In recent years, trying to predict which pace bowlers Pakistan are likely to pick has proven an order taller than Mohammad Irfan.

All the same, let’s have a go.

Mohammad Abbas averages 20.75 in Test cricket and 14.20 in England, so you’d probably pick him.

Shaheen Shah Afridi seems to be the current first-choice left-armer – and Pakistan seem to always pick at least one and possibly three of those, so he’ll probably play too.

Then there’s 17-year-old/19-year-old Naseem Shah

Giving some insight into the Pakistan “system”, Misbah-ul-Haq said: “Waqar Younis and I just saw him in the Gaddafi Stadium and he just looked like a complete bowler and we decided that even though he hadn’t played first-class cricket he should go to Australia.

“By the time he arrived there he had played four games and taken 17 wickets. We could see the potential but now we’ve got the evidence at international level; he’s already got a hat-trick and five-fors.”

We’ve only seen snippets from that Australia series, but he looks sharp. (Here’s why Mohammad Abbas and Naseem Shah are both great.)

Mohammad Abbas, Shaheen Afridi and Naseem Shah are who Pakistan picked last time they played and that’s who we’d pick for the first Test too. But who else can they turn to when fatigue starts to tell?

Well put it this way: they could have played Dads v Lads matches in their intra-squad warm-up matches leading up to this series. 36-year-old Sohail Khan, who got a couple of five-fors against England in 2016, is in the squad and so is the King of Slapbackiness and Witty Comebacks, Wahab Riaz. One of the Imran Khans is in there too. One of the older ones. (No, not that old. Not the most famous one. That one’s kinda busy.)

There are various brands of all-rounder as well.

You can draw your own conclusions about what all of this means, suffice to say Pakistan have alternative bowlers they can pick and they are not traditionally a nation fearful of changing their first team.

None of this really matters if they can’t get any runs of course, but either (or both) of Azhar Ali and Asad Shafiq could suddenly make use of their extensive Test experience while Babar Azam is about as good as they come.


There’s a temptation to try and recap our precap here, but we’ll resist.

We actually have nothing to add. This last section wasn’t really necessary.


Mike Gatting wasn't receiving the King Cricket email when he dropped that ludicrously easy chance against India in 1993.


Why risk it when it's so easy to sign up?


  1. This was a bit more like Twin Peaks where the ‘previously on…’ section contained a load of stuff that hasn’t actually been in previous episodes.

    So I hear, anyway, I never got round to actually watching it.

    As for Pakistan, they look exciting, dynamic, and set to find a whole new way to either collapse in the face of almost guaranteed victory or somehow win despite not really having looked like they had a chance. Or maybe both, it’s a three Test series after all.

      1. Sometimes it did actually subsequently appear on Arrested Development though, at least to an extent. Like the break-in to the ‘blind’ lawyer’s house.

        They kept the viewer guessing.

  2. Do you mean postamble or postcap? Or should you have written a postcap as well as a postamble?

    So many questions. So few answers.

    I’m looking forward to this England v Pakistan series, but you, KC, with all due respect, will need to up your game from here.

    1. We imagine we’ll really go to town on the postviews and similar after the series.

  3. My other conclusion from the Ireland series was been what an obnoxious man Kevin Pietersen is. I realise that lots of people have been saying this for a decade or so, and I’d been trying to ignore It because I loved his batting but it really sank home with his commentary. All his joshing with his fellow commentators (I shudder at the word “banter”) had a really nasty edge to it and he seemed to have an expectation of deference from all around him. What an unpleasant chap.

    He is almost an anti-Charles Dagnall who is the model of amiability, but I can’t really remember playing, although it is a shame his double act with Ebony has been broken up.

    1. I only saw Charlie Dagnall play once:

      Sadly, Daisy did not interrogate Dagnall from her strategic position at the front of the Tavern stand that day – only Darren Stevens got that treatment. I’m pretty sure Charlie Dagnall would have been charming and would have played Daisy’s questions with a straighter bat than the young, relatively inexperienced Darren Stevens.

      I saw KP play many times, of course. I also once saw KP brush aside some young fans outside the academy at Lord’s as he got into his Chelsea tractor to go home. I thought less of him from that point onwards.

  4. Sometimes it did actually subsequently appear on Arrested Development though, at least to an extent. Like the break-in to the ‘blind’ lawyer’s house.

    They kept the viewer guessing.

    1. …much like the comments section has kept me guessing as to whether my comment was posted

    1. It would have done. It had its chance though. It should have tried to finish a day earlier.

      1. Now I’m imagining a schmaltzy film where David Willey and the Ireland ODI series gaze at each other with a rueful smile and say “I guess King Cricket is right – we’ve both just got bad timing…”.

  5. I audibly said ‘oh fuck you’ at the screen by the time we got to the recap part of the preamble.

    Anyway one thing the West Indies had that Pakistan don’t is a lower order that could get them out of trouble. Abbas, Afridi and Shah are all number 11s and Pakistan could play all three while sticking their leg spinners at 7 and 8. Pakistan definitely shouldn’t do that so they probably will.

  6. For those of us who were finding KP’s commentary obnoxious and irritating…

    …and now thought it was safe to go back to the Sky commentary…

    …here’s Shane Warne.

    Now THAT’S what I call obnoxious and irritating.

    And obnoxious. And irritating. Warne makes the same points over and over and over and over again. Which is irritating. And obnoxious. And repetitive.

    1. Yep. Today he said “timed the ears off that” and “an Arthur Fonzarelli thumb”.

      Mind you, as KC has pointed out previously, he’s very good when talking about spin bowling.

Comments are closed.