Josh Bohannon, Matt Parkinson and the mayfly that is Lancashire’s best team in years

Posted by

Last week might have been the first time since the 1990s when we didn’t think Lancashire could have improved their XI by including Glen Chapple.

Chapple is getting on a bit these days, but he was getting on a bit for quite a large proportion of his magnificent playing career and it never really seemed much of an impediment to performance. It’s therefore always felt like his absence from the first team has been an artifice – a ruse to build a bit of confidence in a group of 20-somethings who might otherwise feel dispirited upon witnessing the chasm in ability between themselves and their coach.

This view has survived quite a few middling Lancashire sides and a couple of just-about-better-than-okay ones. But it doesn’t feel so relevant now.

When Lancashire named the side that would go on to beat Gloucestershire by an innings and 57 runs, we thought: “Jeez, this side is surely going to beat Gloucestershire by an innings and 57 runs.”

The most striking element was the bowling attack. This comprised James Anderson, Hasan Ali, Saqib Mahmood and Matt Parkinson, plus two or three all-rounders just in case that foursome couldn’t get the job done.

James Anderson you’ll perhaps have heard of. Mahmood is shaping up as the answer to England’s overseas old ball ineffectiveness. Parkinson increasingly deals in unarguable bowling analyses delivered via an idiosyncratic method that is based around dismissing batters with quite incredible deliveries.

Hasan Ali, meanwhile, is a Pakistan seam bowler.

This week he snapped a stump in half.

All of this wicket-taking power would be rather less valuable if Lancashire were persisting with their long and storied tactic of not making any runs. However, they’ve instead seen fit to put together a middle-order comprising Josh Bohannon (first-class average 47.50 with 231 v Gloucestershire); Steven Croft (in recent years Lancashire’s most reliable batter, 155 v Kent in the first match of the season); and Dane Vilas (first-class average 42.10, 109 v Gloucestershire, 124 v Kent). Throw in Salty Phil and his ball-striking (no-one talks about Phil Salt without using the term ‘ball-striking’) and there’s probably going to be a few runs.

But how long will this last? Have Lancashire made the age-old mistake of becoming a bit *too* good.

For one thing, Hasan Ali is only around for four more games. The short nature of his contract means he’ll surely play them all, but the relentlessly back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to back-to-back nature of early season County Championship matches means the stumps will most likely remain whole in those later matches.

Who honestly knows what’s going on with Jimmy at the minute, but he might only be around for the spring. The same goes for Mahmood.

And then there’s Bohannon and Parkinson, both of whom are being spoken of as potential England players and aren’t really doing their chances any harm by hitting double hundreds and spinning out opponents.

It’s quite possible we’re already at Peak Lancashire.

King Cricket can also be devoured in email form. Find out more here. (There’s not much to find out, if we’re honest. It’s not a complex topic.)

5 comments

  1. Who’s replacing Ali?

    Another noticeable thing I noticed from this round was the incredibly high proportion of victories by an innings, or ten wickets in Warwickshire’s case. Test match series often swing wildly with huge wins for both sides. Is this also becoming more common in the county game?

    1. Championship-wise? No-one. Think a lot of counties just wait and see what the competition situation is and who’s available before making commitments for later in the season.

  2. I know hover captions haven’t been a thing for a while, but I am still mildly deflated by the lack of a hover caption relating to the blurry legs on the main picture.

    Good call writing something about Lancashire being good at this stage of the season, though, would be too risky to wait much longer just in case

Comments are closed.