16

A picture of a massive cricket bat

Bowled on 4th March, 2010 at 09:20 by King Cricket
Category: Extras

Michael sent us this:

Look at that massive cricket bat - it's massive

Can you imagine the excitement? A bat that massive and seemingly no fielders – cricket doesn’t get any better than that.

Scores would be massive! There’d be boundaries every ball!

As we understand it, this is what The People want.

We need to brand this form of cricket immediately. What shall we call it?

Update: This has reminded The Times’ Patrick Kidd of The Monster Bat Incident of 1771.

We are still a bit mental about slow cookers but think we can get the meat to come out "stickier"

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    Bert   //   March 4th, 2010 at 11:10

    And wicket keepers who do impressions of string puppets. That’s what the public wants as well.

  2. Reply
    sam   //   March 4th, 2010 at 11:22

    it’s still got edges. doubtless an english batsman would manage to find them.

  3. Reply
    alex   //   March 4th, 2010 at 12:11

    For Christ’s sake don’t let Lalit Modi see this picture.

  4. Reply
    Monster Cable   //   March 4th, 2010 at 12:26

    The ‘John Howard throw the darkies overboard’ game.

  5. Reply
    jon   //   March 4th, 2010 at 13:01

    how about ‘Ave it’

  6. Reply
    Tim   //   March 4th, 2010 at 14:04

    Give the man a two foot wide bat and he still manages to leave that massive gap between bat and (conspicuous lack of) pad? I’d have been doing laps around the rec if I got caught playing forward like that.

    To be fair, he’s just finished his shift on the gondola and is batting with the end of his oar to save the game, so you’ve got to give him credit for that.

  7. Reply
    e normous   //   March 4th, 2010 at 16:56

    __
    48.3
    Roach to Sibanda, OUT, Smoking guns! Roach literally and otherwise breaks through the defences of the batsman. The bat is broken in two, the off bail has fallen off and Sibanda has to go. A bizarre end to an innings that was for most part, bizarre.
    __

    that’s pretty cool. and that’s how you solve the monster bat problem. why did this not ever happen to Hayden?

  8. Reply
    e normous   //   March 4th, 2010 at 16:58

    and, er, is that a ball painted on that bat in the picture?

  9. Reply
    Ed   //   March 4th, 2010 at 21:53

    A wide bat won’t help you unless you bat the right way round….

  10. Reply
    Ged   //   March 5th, 2010 at 12:24

    Mongoose XXXL

  11. Reply
    Kendal King Pin   //   March 5th, 2010 at 20:44

    “Fetch!”

  12. Reply
    JIm Nariel   //   March 5th, 2010 at 23:05

    I think I need this size to hit the damn ball. Love watching cricket through

  13. Reply
    alex   //   March 6th, 2010 at 20:20

    Wahey! Well said kingpin.

  14. Reply
    Ged   //   March 8th, 2010 at 07:24

    I was just thinking that the batsman was leaving a frightfully big gap between bat and pad considering the size of the bat.

    Then I realised that the batsman isn’t wearing pads.

    But the keeper is wearing pads.

    The world has gone mad. I can’t cope with this. Who could?

  15. Reply
    Monster Cable   //   March 8th, 2010 at 21:35

    Where the hell was this taken? Certainly nowhere in this green and pleasant land. SA? Oz? Kiwiland? India?
    The houses look antipodean but then there’s that grass hut looking thing behind and between two of the houses….

    This chap obviously thought The Dons’ boyhood training with a cricket stump and golfball could only be bettered by going the other way.

  16. Reply
    anothercricketfan   //   March 17th, 2010 at 16:56

    This is more likely a reconstruction of the 1771 incident to demonstrate the size of the bat rather than it actually being used in a cricket match at the time as the bat regulations where in place by the 19th century.

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg