29

Cricket Revolution screenshots

New cricket game! It’s not out yet though, so we’ve no idea how good it is.

It doesn’t matter really. If our short-lived, poorly-paid career as a videogame ‘journalist’ taught us anything, it’s that previews of games only need pictures.

athrapatta.jpg

Mervyn Athrapatta’s going along nicely.

There can be no racism if everybody's white

We’ve rather unhelpfully shrunk this screenshot down so much that you can’t make anything out. If we hadn’t done that, you’d have been able to see that Kumar Sangappora’s vital statistics are as follows:

  • Face: short
  • Weight: feather
  • Height: type one

He’s also Caucasian, unlike many Sri Lankans.

Massive hands required

It’s Dad’s old ‘bowling several balls simultaneously’ trick – only this time it’s TO THE MAX!

Here’s the official website from where you can glean actually-not-very-much-more information.

We are still a bit mental about slow cookers but think we can get the meat to come out "stickier"

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    Suave   //   January 23rd, 2008 at 11:34

    That looks absolute shite!

    Dear lord, I bet they get some buffoon like FatHeadFlatTrackBully to sign up for it, and put his stupid ugly face all over it..

    If that happens, I’m visiting their offices, fully loaded up, and the aftermath will be like the scene in the 1st Matrix film, where they rip up the foyer of the headquarters type building.

  2. Reply
    Miriam   //   January 23rd, 2008 at 12:59

    I just looked at their screenshots. I can’t believe that all the players are Caucasian! They go to the effort of dressing each individual crowd member differently, but then make all the players Caucasian? I don’t like the sound of this cricket “revolution”.

  3. Reply
    Suave   //   January 23rd, 2008 at 14:29

    It can only have been written by South Africans..

    Actually, I just looked it up..

    Mindstorm Studios is based in Lahore.

    Why would Pakistani developers make all the players white?

    Very strange.

  4. Reply
    Venkat   //   January 23rd, 2008 at 17:19

    Oh these games are really not upto the expected level…The interface really leaves us wanting for more…

  5. Reply
    Miriam   //   January 23rd, 2008 at 17:28

    Specifically, it leaves me wanting actual cricket. Luckily there is some on tonight.

  6. Reply
    The Atheist   //   January 23rd, 2008 at 18:23

    What they lose in graphics, they recover in the near-accuracy of the names.And judging by the background, that looks like Old Trafford again.

  7. Reply
    Miriam   //   January 23rd, 2008 at 18:57

    The game website has a forum …

    One of the things being discussed is whether the game will incorporate (a) random wrong umpire decisions and (b) other human factors in the umpires’ decisions such as the umpire getting fed up of over-zealous appealing. This is precisely the kind of supergeeky point that I thought would appall me, but actually I find myself LOVING it! I may have to get this game now.

  8. Reply
    King Cricket   //   January 23rd, 2008 at 19:57

    But where are the towering skyscrapers of the Manchester skyline in that case?

  9. Reply
    A P Webster   //   January 23rd, 2008 at 20:58

    Actually, Manchester is starting to look more and more like that picture – do you think the developers may have been right all along?

  10. Reply
    King Cricket   //   January 24th, 2008 at 09:18

    No, Miriam. That’s how they get you. They make you think that realistic umpiring can only happen in an all-white world.

    How much more genocide will be committed in the name of humanised decision-making in computer games?

  11. Reply
    dr scientician   //   January 24th, 2008 at 10:12

    I’ve just spent that last three years whatching some of those buildings being errected from my former vantage point hight over the south bank of the river thames. That’s a river that is decidedly NOT in Manc.

    Re: the white bread nature of that Pak/Lanka match up there. Is this game actually out, or might those shots be some sort of early development images, using “generic cricket sprite #5687″, or or Shaun Pollock as he’s known to his mum.

    (do game people even talk about sprites these days? How 1992 am I?)

  12. Reply
    King Cricket   //   January 24th, 2008 at 10:26

    Massively, massively 1992.

    The question is, just how much more 1992 could you be?

    The answer, of course, is none – none more 1992.

  13. Reply
    Miriam   //   January 24th, 2008 at 11:02

    I’m not sure that it is still at “generic cricket sprite” stage, as they have put in some physical differences between the players – eg in the “India – Pakistan” screenshot the slip fielder has a beard.

    The game in the “England – Australia” screenshot appears to be played in ancient Egypt.

  14. Reply
    Suave   //   January 24th, 2008 at 11:29

    Well well, Dr!!

    Well done on completion of your PhD.

    Now that you’ve finished that, maybe you can enter the 21st century like the rest of us!

  15. Reply
    King Cricket   //   January 24th, 2008 at 11:53

    Steady on, Suave. Let’s not go racing away into the 21st century before we’re ready.

    You’re getting ahead of yourself.

  16. Reply
    dr scientician   //   January 24th, 2008 at 13:40

    the 21st century?
    Bah, over rated if you ask me. It’s been just terrorism, war, death, and autralian cricketing hegemony.

    Give me the halcyon days of the early 1990s. It was all super nintendos, cheap ice beers and, erm, autralian cricketing hegemony.

  17. Reply
    King Cricket   //   January 24th, 2008 at 14:10

    Couldn’t be bothered typing ‘Australian cricketing hegemony’ twice, eh? Thought you’d copy and paste it, did you? Thought no-one would notice?

    Well we’re onto you, Dr Scientician. We’re onto you.

  18. Reply
    Miriam   //   January 24th, 2008 at 14:32

    Either he couldn’t be bothered, or, like in “Miss Wyoming”, he always makes that mistake, and that’s the error that will enable him to be tracked down, wherever he is, until the end of time.

  19. Reply
    Suave   //   January 24th, 2008 at 14:32

    PhD’s are weren’t the paper they’re written on, these days

    Poor spelling, lazy work..

    It seems any fool can become a Dr. these days.

  20. Reply
    Suave   //   January 24th, 2008 at 14:36

    Aren’t, I meant aren’t…

  21. Reply
    Suave   //   January 24th, 2008 at 14:39

    maybe i shud start a doctorship, or wat its colled nah

  22. Reply
    dr scientician   //   January 24th, 2008 at 14:50

    yes, very good. Laugh at the dyslexic.
    You should be ashamed of yourselves.

    Ashamed.

  23. Reply
    Miriam   //   January 24th, 2008 at 15:58

    Sorry Dr Scientician.

    But King Cricket started it. You know what he is like sometimes.

  24. Reply
    Suave   //   January 24th, 2008 at 16:31

    Sorry Dr Scientician..

    I promise not to laugh at your dyslexia again.

    Those Kings eh, no respect for your average serf.

  25. Reply
    the scientician   //   January 24th, 2008 at 16:55

    it’s ok. I forgive you both (but not KC, I’ll never forgive him for what he’s done…. which, by some sort of freakish chance, is what she said)

  26. Reply
    Suave   //   January 24th, 2008 at 17:13

    The “that’s what she said! trifecta is complete!

  27. Reply
    Miriam   //   January 24th, 2008 at 17:53

    Excellent work, Dr Scientician. Respect. The trifecta is indeed complete, although I will never tire of the joke.

  28. Reply
    Ed   //   March 29th, 2008 at 08:13

    That texturing is something else. I bet you’ll need at least an 80386 with 2mb of ram.

    John Carmack must be pi**ing himself.

  29. Reply
    Herzegovin Hartylambos   //   January 13th, 2009 at 13:20

    The players are not all white.

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg