Mark Boucher at six? This isn’t South Africa

Mark Boucher was confused because there was only a four in the wicktets column yet he was holding a bat

When England took the fourth wicket of what seemed like a mesmerisingly unstrenuous dismantling of the South African batting line-up, we wondered where the real South Africa were. Mark Boucher at six? Where was the breathtaking conservatism for which South African cricket is so renowned?

Think back to the glory days of Shaun Pollock, Nicky Boje and Andrew Hall at eight, nine and ten. The South Africa of old didn’t let the fact that two of those three were utterly mediocre with the ball stop them. Bolster the lower order, just in case – that was the way.

Hopefully they’ve learnt their lesson and dynamism and risk-taking can be put aside once more in favour of the ‘why risk it?’ tactic.

Get the King Cricket email sent to your inbox each day.

3 Appeals to “Mark Boucher at six? This isn’t South Africa”

  1. Ouch!

  2. At least they’ve dropped that two spinners thing. That was just silly.

  3. Better add Symcox to that list.

    There’s something quite odd about seeing a number 10 score a century.

Discussion Area - Make an appeal




Similar deliveries:

  1. Mark Boucher and Graeme Smith – South Africa’s foulweather batsmen
  2. South Africa choke in 1999 World Cup semi final against Australia
  3. Another choketastic performance from South Africa
  4. Shahadat Hossain skittles South Africa
  5. South Africa select bowlers on the basis of bowling ability