Matty Potts: first look in Test cricket

Posted by
2 minute read

We don’t believe you can draw meaningful conclusions from players’ debuts – but we report on them anyway.

Before this match, we wondered whether Matty Potts was unusually tall or unusually quick. Turns out he’s neither, which makes Rob Key’s comment that he saw him as a “point of difference” in England’s attack a little hard to comprehend.

Perhaps he was referring to Potts’ intact spinal column, which is a pretty unusual thing for an England pace bowler to have at his disposal at the minute.

The lack of any really obvious “X-factor” didn’t seem to hamper Potts unduly at Lord’s. Figures of 4-13 are pretty hard to argue with. Which isn’t to say we aren’t going to try.

When we questioned how the 84mph right-armer offered a point of difference on Twitter, plenty of people seemed keen to point to his bowling figures as some sort of rebuttal.

But bowling performances don’t really work like that. Potts’ return tells us he had the means to take wickets on this day, in these conditions. It tells us he can bowl accurately and effectively and isn’t overawed – all of which are worthwhile attributes – but it doesn’t gift him the kinds of standout raw materials that the England Test team tends to find harder to come by.

That’s not a slight. It’s just a fact. A good right-arm fast-medium bowler is still a right-arm fast-medium bowler and right-arm fast-medium bowlers aren’t so rare in England. A very good one is obviously better than a mediocre one, but you have to be a pretty bloody incredible one to have a really transformative effect on the side.

Four wickets for 13 runs is a phenomenal debut; the kind of performance that might leave an onlooker wondering whether he’s actually just a figment of the bowler’s dreaming subconscious mind. But what does it really tell us?

If we take James Anderson’s Test debut in May 2003 as a starting point, it’s possible to pick out a whole bunch of right-arm fast-medium England bowlers who started out really well in England with a Dukes ball.

James Kirtley took 13 wickets at 19.92; Toby Roland-Jones took 17 wickets at 19.64. Then you’ve got the likes of Craig Overton, who averages 27 in home Test matches; Graeme Onions (who was actually quicker than you remember), who averaged 24.62; and of course our old friend Chris Woakes, who takes his home wickets at 22.63.

All good bowlers – a couple of them excellent – but not one with a recipe for success that was really worth sticking in a suitcase.

At the same time, Jimmy Anderson’s home record is okay. Plus, if you’re a regular England bowler, you’re going to play half your cricket in England anyway, so it is pretty handy to be able to bowl there.

So let’s chart a different course. There’s a time for nitpicking and being all neurotic about the future and there’s a time for congratulating the lad who just kicked his international career off by getting Kane Williamson caught at slip.

Very, very well bowled today, Matty Potts.

Our emails are dispatched at slow-medium pace. Slower even. Remember the Chris Harris ‘moon ball’? That sort of pace. Sign up here.


Mike Gatting wasn't receiving the King Cricket email when he dropped that ludicrously easy chance against India in 1993.


Why risk it when it's so easy to sign up?


  1. Oh good, we’re still shit at batting. It’s strangely comforting in these topsy-turvy times.

  2. Maybe the secret to ending Jimmy’s record of bowling less well in the second innings is just making him bowl in the second innings before lunch on Day 2 so he subconsciously thinks it’s actually the first innings….

    This game is being played as if both teams have a big street party planned for the weekend

  3. A quick trawl on the Google for Matty Potts’ height returns one website saying “His height is approx. 6 feet. ” which is nicely precise and imprecise at the same time, and another saying “He has a height of 6 feet and can bowl persistently in the 130-140 kmph range. His parents names are not known.”
    So, there you go, two reliable and corroborating sources.

  4. Like a bus that spends ages waiting at the stop before the bus station because the driver absolutely caned it round the first part of the route and is now way too far ahead of schedule, the game seems to have dropped in pace a bit now…

    1. Or maybe the metaphor is listening to a podcast on normal speed after the first 4 sessions of this match were on 1.5 speed, at least…

      1. Bus driver has woken up again this morning, the rain must have made them realise they weren’t as far ahead of schedule as they’d thought

      2. As Kiwis everywhere no doubt said after the final ball of the 2019 World Cup, “I ‘ate you, Buttler”.

  5. I’m not sure about calling him Matty Potts. The “y” is in the wrong place. Stuarty Broad? Benny Foakes, Benny Stokes, actually they sound ok. Chrissy Woakes?

    1. Apparently he’s had a rethink on the matter too. He’s now a Matt or Matthew. Can only assume they’ve forced him so that they can implement Pottsy.

  6. Isa Guha, as ever, was on the money, consistently referring to him as Matthew. Presumably Pottsy has punched someone, anyone, who called him Matty.

    1. Apparently it’s what he had on his social media but he’s just changed it. Hence our theory that the England team have pushed him into it by deploying Pottsy.

Comments are closed.