8

Joe Denly hits a fourth innings hundred

Bowled on 24th May, 2008 at 14:26 by King Cricket
Category: County cricket news, Joe Denly, Ones to watch

Joe 'No Pants' DenlyWhile largely overshadowed by Rob Key’s silky 26, Joe Denly’s 149 was still a weighty contribution towards a Kent total of 250.

Kent lost, but you can’t really blame No Pants for that. Has anyone got any information on that nickname’s origins yet? If you do know and it’s a bit boring, don’t tell us.

"It’s not that I’m lazy - it’s that I just don’t care"

Make an appeal
  1. Reply
    Sarah, Canterbury   //   May 24th, 2008 at 16:13

    *claps Joe’s fab innings* (apologies for being slightly crickety there)

    Can’t offer any light on the nickname, other than to advise that another bestowed on him is Commando, but I can confirm the presence of undercrackers while on the field at Canterbury…

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=743192&id=673850755

  2. Reply
    Ceci   //   May 24th, 2008 at 18:01

    Commando or not am not pleased with young Joe – had him in my fantasy team and sacked him recently for not earning me enough points (but do not tell Sarah from Canterbury) and the rapscallion immediately goes and gets a trillion runs. Pah!

  3. Reply
    Sarah, Canterbury   //   May 24th, 2008 at 18:23

    Haha! Serves you right for not keeping faith! Please can you ditch any other Kent players you may have immediately!

  4. Reply
    SixSixEight   //   May 24th, 2008 at 23:24

    Such is the way of fantasy cricket. Only when you liberate them are the able to unleash that full potential that lead you to pick em in the first place. Witness the bedazzlement that was Ross Taylor today – fresh out of my team!

  5. Reply
    Gorilla Bananas   //   May 25th, 2008 at 10:04

    He’s no gorilla….and neither was Botham.

  6. Reply
    Sarah, Canterbury   //   May 25th, 2008 at 21:18

    Spent the afternoon at Whitstable Cricket Club where Joe started out. I now know why he is called No Pants. It IS fairly boring. I can let you know if you want me to…

  7. Reply
    Miriam   //   May 26th, 2008 at 10:49

    I simply do not see how a story about why someone is called No Pants can POSSIBLY be boring.

  8. Reply
    Sarah, Canterbury   //   May 26th, 2008 at 11:06

    Miriam, thank you. Have been bursting to spill my findings! Though it actually isn’t that exciting… he chose it himself while at Whitstable when a nickname was required because (and this might surprise you) he used to to go out sans underwear. Not on the cricket field, I hasten to add, as that would have been silly. No Pants stuck, although for the purposes of his cricket shirt Commando was deemed more appropriate.

    I hope this hasn’t spoilt the mystery…

Discussion Area - Make an appeal

Comment RSS | TrackBack URL

Cricket history

Photographs on this site by Sarah Ansell

sarah_ansell.jpeg