How far will England’s Plan A actually carry them?

Posted by
2 minute read

The flipside of everything going pretty much exactly to plan is that this is a thing that almost never happens. The best laid schemes are forever ganging agley and so what are you going to do when you’re back in the real world where absolutely everything goes wrong absolutely all of the time? How are you going to adapt to and succeed in the face of normality?

England’s Plan A hangs off two pegs of markedly contrasting likeliness.

Peg 1 is Jimmy Anderson taking 3-6 in his first six overs. The idea is that the other bowlers then ride that suffocating wave all the way to 78 all out.

Peg 2 is the openers putting on a hundred without losing a wicket. The fact that this is even considered an outside possibility betrays a quite frightening level of delusion within the England camp. Neverthless, this is what somehow occurred in the third Test. This allowed England’s number three to walk out to a wisened and weary middle-aged ball and everyone after him to benefit in a similar way.

It’s a magnificent plan and England duly won by an innings. It’s also a plan that is surely vanishingly unlikely to come to fruition again. So where does that leave us?

The answer…

We don’t know. Absolutely no idea.

A batting side that can reach 100-0 is presumably more likely to manage a respectable 100-1 or 100-2 than the more usual England 100-4, but one swallow doesn’t make a summer and in any case it’s meterological autumn now (if not yet astronomical autumn).

The way we look at it, there is one particularly uncomfortable fact. One batsman has scored twice as many runs as any other in this series. That is clearly – CLEARLY! – a massive weakness for his team.

Take out Virat Kohli’s runs and India are barely diminished. Take out Joe Root’s and England are beached and dead. The tourists are therefore in a far stronger position.

Advantage India.


Mike Gatting wasn't receiving the King Cricket email when he dropped that ludicrously easy chance against India in 1993.


Why risk it when it's so easy to sign up?


  1. As an Indian fan, I worry that Rohit Sharma is “due” more failures

    78 allout seems the norm, rather than the exception, if Rohit is out cheaply.

    Even in that 78 all out, Rohit stayed in for a long time…

  2. England have the best bowler in either team, and the best batsman. India have Virat Kohli who seems intent on “giving it back” at every opportunity. Thus it stands to reason that Virat will score more runs than Joe and take more wickets than Jimmy thus nullifying England’s advantage. Clearly, it’s Advantage India as you say.

    1. England are just so vulnerable having had Jimmy and Root in their side, playing the way they have been.

  3. But there must be joy in the kingdom because of Moeen Ali’s ascension to the Vice Captaincy.

Comments are closed.