Let’s try and identify England’s purest and greatest bits and pieces cricketer

Posted by
8 minute read

A bits-and-pieces cricketer is a player who wouldn’t warrant a place in the side as a batsman or a bowler but somehow gets picked anyway based on cumulative all-round ability. Let’s try and find England’s purest and greatest bits and pieces cricketer.

Before we get into this, you may be wondering why we’re doing this as an England thing and not as an international thing. ‘What about James Hopes?’ you cry. ‘What about Azhar Mahmood?’

The reason why we’re not doing this as an international thing is because the all-time purest and greatest bits and pieces cricketer is New Zealand’s Chris Harris and that is, quite frankly, the start and end of that debate.

Batting in the lower order and bowling at the slower end of medium-pace, Harris played for New Zealand 273 times. At no point in his entire career did he really warrant selection as a specialist in either discipline.

Harris is useful to us though because Harris is the benchmark. Harris is the player against whom all bits and pieces cricketers will forever be measured.

So which England player gets closest to him?


There are all sorts of things to consider here, but players will definitely get points for…

  • Achieving as high a batting average as possible without playing innings of any real substance
  • ‘Keeping it tight’ without taking many wickets
  • Bowling medium-pace (or possibly, at a push, finger spin)

Multiple international hundreds or five-wicket hauls will rule a player out of consideration. (Harris achieved one of each in his 273 matches, which is a measure of just how far he is ahead of his rivals in this field. ‘Rivals’ isn’t an even an appropriate word to use given his clear superiority.)

Players can however boast all manner of achievements at domestic level. It’s international bits-and-piecesery we’re measuring here.

As a final point to note before we get into specific examples, we’re giving weight to longevity. Most bits and pieces cricketers come and go. What we’re trying to figure out here is who has excelled without in any way excelling. That nonsensical equation is the nub of things.

As such, we will be listing players’ international appearances. This figure spans all three formats, but it goes without saying that pretty much all of these guys played more one-day internationals (ODIs) than any other format because ODIs are the best place to see bits and pieces cricket.

Jeremy Snape – 11 matches

Nowhere near enough appearances from Snape, but we mention him because he demonstrates to us some of the important raw ingredients. Snape averaged 29.50 in ODIs without ever passing 38 and took 13 wickets without ever taking more than three in an innings. Had Snape continued doing exactly that across a much a longer career, he’d be our man. His Cricinfo profile even mentions a couple of catches he took within the first paragraph, which is exactly the sort of scrabbling for noteworthy feats that a true bits and pieces cricketer should pride himself on. References are also made to his “loopy bowling and smart batting,” which is exactly the sort of stuff we’re after here.

Rikki Clarke – 22 matches

Despite hitting just one fifty and taking only 15 wickets with never more than three in a game, Clarke finished his Test career with a batting average of 32 and a bowling average of 15. It doesn’t really matter that this arises from just two matches. Clarke cannot be our man.

Jamie Dalrymple – 30 matches

An ODI average of 19.48, plus 16 wickets with never more than two in a game. Feels about right, and two international fifties is probably acceptable within the context of a jarringly lengthy 30-match career. Not bad, but we can probably improve on this.

Dermot Reeve – 32 matches

Ah, now we’re into the big hitters – or, more accurately, the committed nurdlers. Reeve averaged 24.25 in ODIs without ever hitting a fifty (although he did hit one in Tests). He also took 20 wickets at 41 without ever taking more than three in a game. AND he bowled medium pace. Dermot Reeve played 32 international matches because people thought he’d probably ‘contribute’ in some vague, ill-defined way or other. Dermot Reeve is very much in the running.

Ronnie Irani – 34 matches

Irani is in similar territory to Reeve but falls down in a couple of areas. Firstly, he only averaged 14.40 with the bat in ODIs, and this included a fifty. Both of those things count against him. Secondly, his 24 wickets at 41.20 includes 5-26 against India IN THE SAME MATCH AS HE HIT THE FIFTY. Yes, that’s right, we’re effectively disqualifying Irani for being man of the match once. (Click here for the story of Ronnie Irani in Harare.)

Dimitri Mascarenhas – 34 matches

One fifty, 25 wickets and never more than three wickets in an innings. But we did once write an article titled ‘Dimitri Mascarenhas is handy down the order’ which gives a hint as to why he is maybe not our man. One time he finished an innings with five sixes off the last five balls and another time he hit four sixes in a row. These acts aren’t technically against the rules that we are literally making up as we go along, but they do seem to go against the spirit of them.

Ian Blackwell – 35 matches

24 ODI wickets at 36.54 while conceding four an over seems about right, but hitting a fifty while averaging 14.92 with the bat is Irani-esque and wrong.

David Capel – 38 matches

Capel, who sadly died in September, took 38 wickets in international cricket without ever taking more than three in an innings. He also hit three fifties, which would probably have been acceptable if one of them weren’t a Test 98. In summary, while Capel’s batting was poor, but with peaks that were too high and too frequent.

Adam Hollioake – 39 matches

A relatively strong case from Hollioake because while many bits and pieces cricketers tip the selection scales with their capable fielding, he also threw captaincy into the mix and that qualifies as an extra bit or piece. Three ODI fifties and an average of 25.25 is in the right ballpark too. However, his 34 wickets came at an average of 31.84 which is just a tad too good for our taste. Reeve remains our frontrunner.

Mike Yardy – 42 matches

A solid but unremarkable effort from Yardy – whatever the hell that means when we are literally remarking on how unremarkable things are. The Sussex spinner took 32 international wickets and never more than three in a game. He hit two fifties, both in ODIs, where he averaged 20.37. Confusingly, he won the World T20 in 2010 – which obviously counts against him – but did so while refusing to take wickets, conceding just 6.5 an over. There is definitely something here, but Dermot Reeve bowled medium-pace and we consider that the decisive factor.

Geoff Miller – 59 matches

Miller took 85 international wickets with one five-for. That sounds like altogether too many wickets until you consider that 60 of them were taken in his 34 Tests matches, where of course he often bowled in two innings, not just one. His Test batting average of 25.80 is excellent, but seven fifties is too many with a top score of 98 not out compounding that.

Samit Patel – 60 matches

There are some very good bits and pieces on display if you survey Samit’s international record. He averaged more with the ball than the bat in all three formats and only hit two fifties in total. His 24 ODI wickets came at an average of 45.45 and his one five-for is forgivable given the number of matches he played. His ODI batting average of 32.13 is also very fine given that it is bolstered by only one fifty. All in all, strong work from a committed cricketer – and his Test work was very bits and pieces-y too. Samit may have pushed Reeve off the top step of the podium here.

James Tredwell (64 matches) and Robert Croft (71 matches)

We’re lumping Tredwell and Croft together because people will suggest them, but really they were spinners who could slightly bat and that isn’t quite the same thing. Tredwell didn’t take an international five-for, but he took five four-fors and averaged under 30 in both Tests and ODIs. Despite a solid domestic record, he didn’t achieve much with the bat at all internationally. Croft’s ODI bowling record (45 wickets at 38.73 and never more than three in an innings) looks like it fits the bill, but again there is no real batting record to support it.

Mark Ealham – 72 matches

Immediately feels like a contender, but actually his case is not quite so strong as you’d think. For one thing, he took two ODI five-fors – twice as many as Chris Harris. He also averaged 32.79 in that format and 28.70 in eight Tests, which speaks of far too much ability with the ball. Plus despite his billing as an “all-rounder” there is no real batting record to make up for any of that. Bustling medium-pace though – at least he has that.

Luke Wright – 101 matches

101 matches! 101 matches in which he did a certain amount of bowling but never once took more than two wickets. Wright also failed to hit an international hundred with six fifties an impressively unimpressive return from that incredible number of appearances. Four of those fifties were in T20Is though, where they’re obviously a bigger deal, and one of them was a 99 not out, which was obviously quite a big deal indeed. But still: Luke Wright played 101 matches for England without ever really seeming like he was a batsman or a bowler.


There’s no fully satisfactory answer here. If you’re asking who has been England’s purest bits and pieces cricketer, we’d have to go with Dermot Reeve. Very few runs, very few wickets, medium pace. He ticks all the boxes.  

But then if you’re asking who has been England’s greatest bits and pieces cricketer, we’d argue that Samit Patel and Luke Wright delivered a greater number of confused shrugs over the course of their respective careers.

Patel has to get some credit for offering his bits and pieces across all three formats. But while he gave us 60 matches of cameos and noncontribution, Wright semi-delivered or failed to do so across a whopping 101 matches.

Put it like this: In 50 ODIs, Luke Wright’s two greatest contributions were 52 runs in a rain-reduced no result against New Zealand and 2-34 off six overs in a low-scoring defeat against the same opposition.

The two wickets he took in that match were Kyle Mills and Tim Southee.

Luke Wright has been England’s greatest bits and pieces cricketer.

Why not sign up to get our articles emailed to you? And if you already get the email, how about joining the fine folk who are chipping in a couple of quid each month to support the site on Patreon? Pledges help us do more features like this. You can flip us a shiny coin or buy us a pint each month here. Don’t feel you have to, but huge thanks if you do.


Mike Gatting wasn't receiving the King Cricket email when he dropped that ludicrously easy chance against India in 1993.


Why risk it when it's so easy to sign up?


  1. I would go with Samit Patel for his all round bits-n-pieces-ery

    Wright seems too good as a batsman in T20s (if I remember correctly he played a key role in England winning its first ever men’s world title of any kind)

    He is in bits-n-pieces mold in ODIs but nit T20s

    Bottomline: Wright is wrong and Samit is right

    1. *does some research* this is actually pretty interesting, Wright didn’t really do a whole lot in that World T20 win.

      He bowled one over in the entire tournament (when Yardy got hit out of the attack in the final). It was, to be fair, a *good* over, conceding just five runs and taking a wicket. He hadn’t been needed until then – as a collective, Sidebottom, Broad, Bresnan, Swann and Yardy had dominated.

      With the bat he gave us 45*, 24, 20, 1*, 0 and two DNBs. The 24 was probably the most decisive of these in a tight run chase against New Zealand.

      The 45* might have been decisive against West Indies (we scored a substantial 191/5) if rain hadn’t intervened and set them 60 from 6 overs, a chase Chris Gayle laughed at.

      The 20 may also have been decisive against Ireland, we only made 120 in that game before rain forced a no result (it’s baffling to remember that although England cruised through the tournament from the second round onwards, they squeaked through the first round by the skin of their teeth).

      In the semi- and final Wright’s batting services were not required. Kieswetter, Lumb and Pietersen did the bulk of the work, with Collingwood and Morgan seeing the chases home.

      Wright took two catches in the tournament. That’s not bad, same number as Morgan, even Collingwood only took four catches across the whole thing. Run outs are harder to research so I’m not sure how effective he was there but he did, importantly, run out David Hussey in the final when he was going well.

      Number 6 batsman, number 6 bowler, something of a passenger for most of the tournament. ICC silverware winner, Luke Wright.

  2. I think that if you look at it from a all 3 formats perspective then Samit Patel is the winner.
    From an ODI perspective, then Luke Wright is the undoubted winner. However, his T20 record is decent so I would argue that Samit Patel is the overall winner.

    1. 51 matches, four fifties and 18 wickets is “understandable given where he was usually asked to bat and how often he was allowed to bowl” but it is not “decent”.

      Also, you absolutely do not weigh all formats equally in this situation. ODIs are the spiritual home of both bits and pieces.

  3. It’s a geographical thing. Batsmen come from The South, bowlers come from The North. Patel, Wright, Ealham, Miller, Reeves – these were all Midlands cricketers, neither Arthur nor Martha, lost in the amorphous middle.

    It’s as if they looked at decisiveness and thought, “I’m not sure if that’s for me”. Dig a bit deeper, you’ll find they’re all CofE, tea with half a spoonful of sugar, Indie readers.

  4. I know your policy on requests, but could we see a Sim Series featuring bits and pieces elevens? Perhaps England v New Zealand as they seem to be the home of bits and pieces?

    Off the top of my head for NZ you could have:

    Rod Latham
    Anton Devcich
    Chris Harris (c)
    Shane Thomson
    Dipak Patel
    Grant Bradburn
    Mitchell Santner
    Justin Vaughan
    Lee Germon (wk)
    Darryl Mitchell
    James Franklin

    12th man: Jeff Wilson

    1. If you’re picking on the all-rounder/bits and pieces spectrum, you can get at least half a New Zealand side from 1999 alone…

      Chris Harris, Chris Cairns, Craig McMillan, Scott Styris, Dan Vettori…

      1. Seems a little harsh including Vettori and Cairns in a bits and pieces eleven. They were both at least a piece if not an out and out bit.

      2. Suppose we could try this mob against the Mars eleven:


        12th man Warne.

        Not sure who gets the new ball, but it’s quite easy to squeeze two spinners in.

  5. When I read the title of this piece I thought Ealham, and none of your fancy investigative journalism / research will dissuade me of this. My main reason for this decision / conclusion / categorical fact is that the winner has to be a team man / woman / person etc. The winner has to be the sort of player who makes the tea, washes the whites (or Gymjams) and knows how to repair the leak on the wash basin in the changing room. Basically an all-round good egg who can give you 6 overs of medium pace before the new ball, or whack a no-nonsense 7 before Fraser, Malcolm & Tufnell get to the crease. Here are my workings:

    Snape – No – Google searches reveal that his Cricinfo profile is below his company website and Linkedin profile. Search engine optimisation seems a little ‘off’ for an ex-cricketer.

    Clarke – No – Bizarre spellings of Christian names will not be tolerated.

    Dalrymple – No – Spinner.

    Reeve – No – Gobshite.

    Irani – No – Talksport.

    Blackwell – No – Spinner and wrong handed.

    Capel – No – Was deemed good enough to keep I.T. out of the side for a bit.

    Miller – No – Spinner, and there’s a picture of him talking to Giles Clarke but no report of him having punched the seedy git in the face.

    Patel, Treds & Croft – No – Always seemed a bit too good to be a bit or a piece (obviously spinners also).

    Wright – No, but only just – Bleach blonde hair, Sussex and shares his name with a poet who is a bit of a git.

    The winner is Mark Ealham. Smart haircut, always tried his best and the sort you’d send to lob the grenade into the enemy machinegun post before waving the rest of the lads forward.

  6. I was going to suggest Anthony McGrath for the list but visited his profile page to find out he averaged 40 in test cricket, shocked!

  7. It’s also worth looking at player of the match awards. Ealham and Tredwell won 3 each in ODIs which is a bit high. Wright also has 3, but all in T20s. Patel has just the one, which is strong work, but Croft is the real standout, getting through his 71 matches without once being the best player. Miller also completed his career with no awards. Yardy has one Player of the match award, but it is for scoring 35* and bowling a tidy 1-21 which is a very bits & pieces effort to win the award.

  8. Excellent.

    Shout outs for Matthew Fleming, Neil Smith, Vince Wells, Derek Pringle,. Gavin Hamilton and Vic Marks.

  9. I do wish you had left out the “bits and pieces cricketer” part from the title – that way this piece could’ve gotten a lot of hits from alt-right KKK types. Imagine their disappointment!

    1. Whither Derek Pringle?

      Perhaps for this assessment his test batting was a bit too poor and his test bowling a bit too good, but in the premium ODI format, in 44 games he had no 50s (a best of 49*) at 24 and took one wicket a game at 38 with never more than 4 wickets in an innings.

Comments are closed.